期刊文献+

产妇急产的影响因素及其预防方案探讨 被引量:7

The influence factors of maternal emergency birth and prevention programs
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨产妇急产的影响因素和预防方案。方法选择2012年1月至2013年12月在我院生产的产妇,严格按照急产定义在产妇中选择132例急产产妇为急产组,在正常分娩的产妇中随机选取132例为非急产组。对两组产妇的年龄、流产次数、怀孕次数、胎儿体重等基本情况进行比较,分析产妇急产的影响因素,对两组产妇的产后并发症进行比较,探讨产妇急产的预防方案。结果两组孕妇的年龄、怀孕次数、流产和引产总次数、生产胎儿次数、前两产程时间、早产情况存在差异,且差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。急产组术后出血、产道裂伤、产道感染、婴儿窒息、婴儿头颅血肿、婴儿黄疸等并发症发生几率明显高于非急产组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论产妇急产的影响因素主要有产妇的年龄、怀孕次数、流产和引产总次数、生产胎儿次数、前两产程时间、早产、胎儿体重等因素,预防产妇早产应该对产妇产程进行密切关注。 Objective To study the influence factors of maternal urgent production and prevention programs. Methods 132 acute maternal productions were selected as urgent production group. 132 normal deliveries were selected as non-urgent production group. The maternal age, the number of abortions, number of pregnancies and fetal weight were analyzed. The maternal postpartum complications were observed. Results The results shown age, pregnancy, abortion and induced labor total number, production number of fetus, the first two stages of time differences and prema- ture birth of the two groups were statistically significantly different (P〈0.05). The risk of complications in emergency birth group such as postpartum hemorrhage, the birth canal laceration, postoperative vaginal infection, baby suffocate and cranial hematoma, infant jaundice was significantly higher than that of non-urgent production group (P〈0.05). Con- clusion The major influencing factors of maternal emergency birth are maternal age, pregnancy, abortion and induced la- bor total number, production number of fetus, the first two labor time, preterm labor and fetal weight.
作者 李敏
出处 《西部医学》 2015年第5期748-750,共3页 Medical Journal of West China
关键词 产妇急产 影响因素 预防方案 Emergency birth Influencing factors Prevention programs
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献26

  • 1贾金平.397例急产的临床分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2005,20(2):234-235. 被引量:11
  • 2冯润芳.急产并发症处理及预防[J].青海医药杂志,2005,35(4):32-33. 被引量:5
  • 3Olesen AW, Westergaard JG, Olsen J. Perinatal and maternal complications related to postterm delivery: a national registerbased study, 1978 - 1993. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2003,189:222-227.
  • 4Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et aL Births : final data for 2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep, 2005, 54:1-116.
  • 5Allen VM, O' Connell CM, Baskett TF. Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induetion of labor at term. Obstet Gyneeol, 2006,108:286-294.
  • 6Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hellmann J, et al. Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. The Canadian Muhicenter Post-term Pregnancy Trial Group. N Engl J Med, 1992, 326 : 1587-1592.
  • 7Maslow AS, Sweeny AL. Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at tenn. Obstet Gyneco1,2000,95:917-922.
  • 8Glantz JC. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes. J Reprod Med, 2005,50:235-240.
  • 9Heimstad R, Skogvoll E, Mattsson LA, et aL Induction of labor or serial antenatal fetal monitoring in postterm pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol, 2007,109:609-617.
  • 10Harris BA, Huddleston JF, Sutliff G, et al. The unfavorable cervix in prolonged pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol, 1983, 62: 171-174.

共引文献29

同被引文献61

引证文献7

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部