期刊文献+

基于有序加权算子赋权的大型工程项目管理绩效模糊评价研究 被引量:6

Study on fuzzy evaluation of large engineering project management performance on OWA operator
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 大型工程项目管理绩效评价是大型项目管理至关重要的环节,评价方法的科学与否影响管理水平的高低.为了使评价更具合理性,根据项目管理的九大知识领域建立了大型工程项目管理绩效评价指标体系,利用有序加权方法计算指标权重,通过模糊评价方法对大型工程项目管理绩效进行定量评价,提高了评价的可靠性.最后通过实证研究,分析绩效评价结果,提出相应改进措施,说明该方法具有可行性. The evaluation of large engineering project management performance proves to be important in the scientific method of evaluation and the level of management. In order to make the evaluation reasonable, the paper establishes the evaluation index system of large engineering project management based on the PMBOK (Project Management Body of Knowl edge), then calculates the index weight by using OWA (Ordered Weighted Averaging) method, then makes a quantitative evaluation of large engineering project management performance on method of fuzzy evaluation. Through empirical research, it analyses the results of performance evaluation and puts forward the corresponding improvement measures.
出处 《青岛理工大学学报》 CAS 2015年第2期33-38,共6页 Journal of Qingdao University of Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71471094) 青岛市社会科学规划项目(QDSKL130144)
关键词 有序加权算子 大型工程项目管理 绩效评价 模糊评价方法 OWA operator management of large engineering project evaluation of performance method of fuzzy evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献44

  • 1金吾伦,郭元林.复杂性管理与复杂性科学[J].复杂系统与复杂性科学,2004,1(2):25-31. 被引量:36
  • 2周晓宏.项目管理中的挣值管理方法研究——兼与戚安邦同志商榷[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2005,22(4):143-148. 被引量:25
  • 3温素彬,薛恒新.基于科学发展观的企业三重绩效评价模型[J].会计研究,2005(4):60-64. 被引量:113
  • 4Yager R R. Families of OWA operators[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1993,59:125-148.
  • 5Yager R R. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making [J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1988,18 : 183-190.
  • 6Yager R R. Including importances in OWA aggregations using fuzzy systems modeling[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 1998,6:286-294.
  • 7Xu Z S. An Overview of methods for determining OWA weights[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2005,20:843-865.
  • 8Xu Z S. Dependent OWA operators[J].Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence,2006,3885,172-178.
  • 9WINTER M.SMITH C,MORRIS P.Directions for future research in project management:The main findings of a UK government-funded research network[J].International Journal of Project Management,2006,24(8):638-649.
  • 10OTTINO J M.Engineering complex systems[J].Nature,2004,4(27)::99.

共引文献223

同被引文献51

  • 1许炳,于浩.基于平衡记分卡的建筑施工企业项目管理绩效评价研究[J].建筑经济,2008,29(S2):71-74. 被引量:12
  • 2闫文周,徐静,吁元铭.神经网络在工程项目管理绩效评价中的应用研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2005,37(4):557-560. 被引量:25
  • 3郭智杰,陆上云,边亦海.可拓学理论在深基坑安全评估中的应用研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2006,2(5):851-854. 被引量:11
  • 4王煜,徐泽水.OWA算子赋权新方法[J].数学的实践与认识,2008,38(3):51-61. 被引量:90
  • 5Barney J. B.. Purchasing, supply chain management and sustained competitive advantage: the relevance of resource- based theory [J]. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2012 (2).
  • 6Yang T., Wen Y. F., Wang F. F.. Evaluation of robustness of supply chain information-sharing strategies using a hybrid Taguchi and multiple criteria decision-making method [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011(2).
  • 7Li Y., Liu X., Chen Y.. Supplier selection using axiomatic fuzzy set and TOPSIS methodology in supply chain management[J]. Fuzzy Optimization & Decision Making,2012 (2).
  • 8Erol I., Sencer S., Sari R.. A new fuzzy multi-criteria framework for measuring sustainability performance of a supply chain [J ]. Ecological Economics, 2011 (6).
  • 9Wang J., Wang J. Q., Zhang H. Y., et al.. Multi-criteria decision-making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: An outranking approach[J]. Information Sciences,2015(4).
  • 10Olugu E. U., Wong K. Y.. An expert fuzzy rule-based system for closed-loop supply chain performance assessment in the automotive industry[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012(1).

引证文献6

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部