期刊文献+

基于理想点法的矿区生态环境敏感性评价 被引量:4

Eco-environment Sensitivity Evaluation of Mining Areas Based on TOPSIS
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]对河北省保定市涞源县13个主要矿区进行生态环境敏感性评价,旨在为矿区生态环境评价和治理提供理论基础和技术保障。[方法]通过PSR框架模型建立矿区生态环境敏感性评价指标体系,并引入理想点(TOPSIS)法。[结果](1)空间布局上,涞源县南部矿区生态环境质量较差,中部矿区中等,而北部矿区较好;(2)具体矿区上,塔崖驿乡矿区、东团堡乡矿区生环境敏感性最好,而乌龙沟乡矿区最差。[结论]引入TOPSIS法进行小尺度县域矿区范围内生态环境敏感性评价,评价过程简便易行,可操作性强,且不受评价指标个数的影响,评价结果更加准确、客观、实用,能很好地反映涞源县各矿区生态环境的优劣程度及区域差异。 [Objective]This paper aimed to provide the theoretical basis and technical support for evaluation and management of ecological environment in mining area based on a evaluation case study of the ecological sensitivities of 13 major mining areas in Laiyuan County of Baoding City,Hebei Province.[Methods]PSR model was applied for ecological sensitivity evaluation.And also technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS)method was introduced into the evaluation process.[Results](1)The space layout of the ecological environment quality in Laiyuan County showed a radial incremental feature existed from the southeast to the northwest;(2)In term of the sensitivity difference of the mining area,the ecological environmental sensitivities of township of Tayayi and Dongtuanbao mining were better,and the sensitivity of Wulonggou mining area was worse.[Conclusion]The introduced evaluation of the TOPSIS method for the evaluation of ecological sensitivity of mining area had some obvious advantages.It can make the evaluation process simple,operable and less relayed on the evaluation index number.All of these make the evaluation result more accurate,objective and practical,and furthermore,the results can well describe expound the merits of each mine's ecological level and regional difference.
出处 《水土保持通报》 CSCD 2015年第2期225-230,共6页 Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation
关键词 生态环境 敏感性 理想点法 矿区 eco-environment sensitivity TOPSIS mining area
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1任忠宝,王世虎,唐宇,周海东.矿产资源需求拐点理论与峰值预测[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(9):1480-1489. 被引量:27
  • 2陶知翔,成先雄,赵美珍.矿山环境问题与防治对策[J].金属矿山,2008,37(1):103-106. 被引量:31
  • 3孙才志,杨磊,胡冬玲.基于GIS的下辽河平原地下水生态敏感性评价[J].生态学报,2011,31(24):7428-7440. 被引量:33
  • 4Carrington D P, Gallimore R G, Kutzbaeh J E. Climate sensitivity to wetlands and wetland vegetation in mid- Holocene North Africa[J]. Climate Dynamics, 2001, 17 (2/3) : 151-157.
  • 5Horne R, Hickey J. Ecological sensitivity of Australian rain[orests to selective logging[J]. Australian Journal of Ecology, 1991, 16(1): 119-129.
  • 6Mtlzik I. Sensitivity of hydrologic systems to climate change[J]. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 2001, 26(2) : 233-252.
  • 7Rodriguez E, Vila L. Ecological sensitivity atlas of the Argentine continental shelf[J]. International Hydrogra- phic Review, Monaco, 1992, 69(2): 4:7-53.
  • 8Tao Fulu, Feng Zongwei. Terrestrial ecosystem sensi- tivisy to acid deposition in South China[J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2000, I18(3/4): 231-243.
  • 9Driscoll C T, Lawrence G B, Bulger A J, et al. Acidicdeposition in the Northeastern United States: Sources and inputs, ecosystem effects, and management strate- gies: The effects of acidic deposition in the northeastern United States include the acidification of soil and water, which stresses terrestrial and aquatic biota]-J:. BioSci ence, 2001, 51(3): 180-198.
  • 10王月健,徐海量,王成,凌红波,刘红玲,王绍明.过去30a玛纳斯河流域生态安全格局与农业生产力演变[J].生态学报,2011,31(9):2539-2549. 被引量:11

二级参考文献225

共引文献599

同被引文献72

引证文献4

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部