摘要
目的观察磁珠耳压疗法治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征的临床疗效。方法入选阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征OSAHS患者92例,随机数字法随机分为磁珠组31例,予以磁珠耳穴贴压;王不留行组30例,予以王不留行耳穴贴压;对照组31例,以胶布耳穴黏贴,疗程为12周。观察临床疗效、治疗前后临床症状积分、EpwortH嗜睡量表评分、患者AHI值、最低SaO_2情况。结果磁珠组与王不留行组临床疗效与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),尤其是轻、中度组疗效更显著。磁珠纽与王不留行组治疗后患者临床症状积分、EpwortH嗜睡量表评分、AHI值、最低SaO_2均较治疗前改善,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。磁珠组与王不留行组比较,在EpwortH嗜睡量表评分及嗜睡、倦怠、胸闷症状改善方面差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论磁珠耳压疗法是轻中度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者方便安全的可行性治疗方法 。
Objective： To study the therapeutic effects of auricular point sticking by magnetic beads on patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome （OSAHS）. Methods：By random number table, the 92 OSAHS patients were divided into 31 cases of magnetic beads group （mb group） administered auricular-plaster therapy of magnetic beads, 30 cases of vaccaria segetalis group （vs group） given auricular-plaster therapy of vaccaria segetalis and 31 cases of control group with auricular points plastered by tapes for 12 weeks course. Clinical effects, symptoms and signs indexes before and after treatment, Epworth sleepiness scores, patients＇ AHI values as well as the lowest SaO2 were observed and com- pared between the two groups. Results： The comparison of clinical effects between mb as well as vs groups and control group had statistical meanings （ P〈0.05 ）, especially marked in the minor and middle patients. After treatment, the clini- cal symptoms indexes, Epworth sleepiness scores, patients＇ AHI values as well as the lowest SaO2 improved compared to those before treatment and the comparison between the two groups and control group had statistical meanings （P〈0.05）. In the comparison of Epworth sleepiness scores, symptoms indexes of somnolence, fatigue as well as stuffiness between mb and vs groups, the differences had statistical meanings （P〈0. 05）. Conclusion： Auricular point sticking by magnetic beads is feasible and safe to treat minor and middle OSAHS patients.
出处
《陕西中医学院学报》
2015年第3期61-64,122,共5页
Journal of Shaanxi College of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金
福建中医药大学附属人民医院临床创新技术基金(CXZD1306)
