期刊文献+

不同剂量瑞舒伐他汀对短暂性脑缺血发作患者颈动脉易损斑块和脑缺血事件的影响:前瞻性随机对照研究 被引量:7

Effects of different doses msuvastalin on carotid vulnerable plaques and cerebral ischemic events in patients with transient ischemic attack: a prospective randomized controlled trial
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同剂量瑞舒伐他汀对短暂性脑缺血发作(transient ischemic attack,TIA)患者颈动脉易损斑块和脑缺血事件的影响。方法前瞻性纳入存在颈动脉易损斑块的TIA患者,随机分为瑞舒伐他汀常规剂量组和大剂量组,前者在常规治疗基础上加服瑞舒伐他汀10mg/d,后者在常规治疗基础上加服瑞舒伐他汀20mg/d。随访6个月。治疗前后检测血脂,颈部血管超声检测颈动脉内膜一中膜厚度(intima—media thickness,IMT)、斑块面积和Crouse斑块积分。比较治疗后6个月内的脑缺血事件发生率。结果共纳入71例患者,常规剂量组35例,大剂量组36例,常规剂量组和大剂量组分别失访2例和1例。大剂量组基线总胆固醇(total cholesterol,TC)[(5.65±1.05)mmol/L对(5.46±0.87)mmol/L;t=0.812,P=0.419]、三酰甘油(triglyceride,TG)[(2.85±0.74)mmol/L对(2.95±0.86)mmol/L;t=0.513,P=0.609]、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(10w—density lipoprotein cholesterol,LDL-C)[(4.11±0.47)mmol/L对(4.08±0.33)mmol/L;t=0.304,P=0.761]和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(high-densicy lipoprotein cholesterol,HDL—C)[(1.27±0.22)mmol/L对(1.23±0.20)mmol/L;t=1.339,P=0.185]与常规剂量组差异无统计学意义;治疗后,大剂量组TC[(3.06±0.77)mmol/L对(4.98±0.78)mmol/L;t=10.214,P〈0.001]、TG[(2.15±0.56)mmol/L对(2.52±0.68)mmol/L;t=2.492,P=0.015]和LDL-C[(2.18±0.59)mmol/L对(3.86±0.42)mmol/L;t=13.526,P〈0.001]显著低于后组,而HDL—C[(1.43±0.20)mmol/L对(1.33±0.21)mmol/L;t=2.010,P=0.048]显著高于常规剂量组。大剂量组基线IMT[(1.59±0.26)mm对(1.58±0.28)mm;t=0.152,P=0.879]、斑块面积[(0.87±0.29)mm。对(0.85±0.34)mm^2;t=0.261,P=0.749]和Crouse积分[(4.26±0.31)mm对(4.184-0.25)mm;t=1.171,P=0.245]与常规剂量组差异无统计学意义;治疗后大剂量组IMT[(1.26±0.25)mm对(1.44±0.27)mm;t=2.852,P=0.005]、斑块面积[(0.50±0.25)mm。对(0.70±0.25)mm^2;归3.298,P=0.001]和Crouse积分[(2.30±0.26)mm对(4.03±0.24)mm;t=28.509,P〈0.001]均较常规剂量组显著降低。大剂量组脑缺血事件发生率显著低于常规剂量组(11.76%对29.41%x^2=3.202,P=0.001)。结论瑞舒伐他汀具有显著的降脂作用,能消除或稳定颈动脉易损斑块,减少缺血性卒中事件,瑞舒伐他汀20mg/d的作用优于10mg/d。 Objective To investigate the effects of different doses rosuvastatin on carotid vulnerable plaques and cerebral ischemic events in patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA). Methods The TIA patients with carotid vulnerable plaques were enrolled retrospectively. They were randomly divided into either a rosuvastatin conventional dose group or a high-dose group. On the basis of conventional treatment, the former was also given rosuvastatln 10 mg/d, and on the basis of conventional treatment, the latter also took rosuvastatin 20 mg/d. The patients were followed up for 6 months. Blood lipid was detected before and after treatment. The carotid lntima-media thickness (IMT), atherosclerotic plaque area, and Crouse plaque score were detected with cervical vascular ultrasound. The incidences of cerebral ischemic events were compared within six months after treatment. Results A total of 71 patients were enrolled. There were 35 patients in the conventional-dose group and 36 patients in the high-dose group. Two and one patients were lost to follow up respectively in both the conventional-dose group and the high-dose group. There were no significant differences in baseline total cholesterol (TC) (5.65 ± 1.05 mmol/L vs. 5.46 ±0. 87 mmol/L; t =0. 812, P = 0. 419), triacylglycerol (TG) (2.85 ± 0. 74 mmol/L vs. 2. 95 ± 0. 86 mmoYL; t = 0. 513, P = 0. 609), lowdensity lipoproteln cholesterol (LDL-C) (4. 11± 0. 47 mmol/L vs. 4. 08 ± 0. 33 mmol/L; t = 0. 304, P = 0. 761), and high-density lipoproteln cholesterol (HDL-C) (1.27 ± 0.22 mmol/Lvs. 1.23 ±0. 20 mmol/L; t = 1. 339, P =0. 185) between the high-dose group and the conventional dose group. After treatment, TC (3.06 ±0. 77 mmol/L vs. 4. 98 ± 0. 78 mmol/L; t = 10. 214, P〈 0. 001), TG (2. 15± 0. 56 mmol/L vs. 2.52 ± 0. 68 mmol/L; t = 2. 492, P = 0. 015), and LDL-C (2.18± 0. 59 mmol/L vs. 3.86 ±0.42 mmol/L; t = 13.526, P 〈0. 001) in the high-dose group were significantly lower than those in the latter, while HDL-C (1.43 ±0.20 mmol/L vs. 1.33 ±0.21 mmol/L; t=2.010, P= 0.048) was significantly higher than the conventional dose group. There were no significant differences in baseline IMT (1.59±0. 26 mm vs. 1.58 ±0.28 mm; t =0. 152, P =0. 879), plaque area (0. 87± 0.29 mm2 vs. 0. 85± 0. 34 mm^2; t =0. 261, P =0. 749), and Crouse score (4. 26± 0. 31 mm vs. 4. 18±0. 25 mm; t = 1. 171, P = 0. 245) between the high-dose group and the conventional dose group; after treatment, IMT (1.26 ±0. 25 mm vs. 1.44 ± 0. 27 mm; t = 2. 852, P = 0. 005), plaque area (0. 50 ± 0. 25 mm^2 vs.0. 70 ± 0.25 mm^2; t = 3. 298, P = 0. 001), and Crouse score (2. 30 ±0. 26 mm vs. 4. 03±0. 24 mm; t =28. 509, P〈0. 001) in the high-dose group were significantly decreased compared with the conventional dose group. The incidence of cerebral lschemic events in the high-dose group was significantly lower than that in the conventional dose group (11.76% vs. 29.41% ; X^2 = 3. 202, P = 0. 001 ). Conclusions Rosuvastatln has significant lipid-lowering effect. It can eliminate or stabilize carotid vulnerable plaque and reduce ischemic stroke events. The effect of rosuvastatln 20 mg/d is superior to that of rosuvastatln 10 mg/d.
出处 《国际脑血管病杂志》 2015年第4期249-254,共6页 International Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases
关键词 脑缺血发作 短暂性 斑块 动脉粥样硬化 羟甲基戊二酰基COA还原酶抑制剂 瑞舒 伐他汀 治疗结果 Ischemic Attack, Transient Plaque, Atherosclerotic Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoAReductase Inhibitors Rosuvastatin Treatment Outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1Magee KR. Cerebral vascular diseases. Transactions of the Fourth Conference Held Under the Auspices of the American Neurological Association and the American Heart Association. JAMA, 1965, 194: 474.
  • 2Albers GW, Caplan LR, Easton JD, et al; TIA Working Group. Transient ischemic attack--proposal for a new definition. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347: 1713-1716.
  • 3Shah S,Saver J, Kidwell C, et al. A multicenter pooled, patient-lev- el data analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI in TIA patients. Stroke, 2007, 38: 463.
  • 4Easton JD, Saver JL, Albers GW, et al; American Heart Associa- tion; American Stroke Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. Definition and evaluation of tmasient ischemic attack: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Hent Association/ American Stroke Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovas- cular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; and the Inter- disciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke, 2009, 40: 2276-2293.
  • 5Calvet D, Touze E, Oppenheim C, et al. DWI lesions and TIA etiology improve the prediction of stroke after TIA. Stroke, 2009, 40: 187-192.
  • 6Fiehler J, Knudsen K, Kucinski T, et al. Predictors of apparent diffusion coefficient normalization in stroke patients. Stroke, 2004, 35: 514-519.
  • 7Wechsler LR. Imaging evaluation of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke, 2011, 42(1 Suppl): S12-S15.
  • 8Sylaja PN, Hill MD. Transient ischemic attacks--definition, risk prediction and urgent management. Neurol India, 2009, 57: 252-256.
  • 9Giles MF, Rothwell PM. Risk of stroke early after transient ischaemic attack: a systermtic review mad meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol, 2007, 6: 1063-1072.
  • 10Wu CM, McLaughlin K, Lorenzetti DL, et al. Early risk of stroke after transient ischemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med, 2007, 167: 2417-2422.

共引文献33737

同被引文献54

引证文献7

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部