期刊文献+

海洋工程生态损害评估与补偿——以厦门杏林跨海大桥为例 被引量:19

Ecological damage assessment and compensation of marine engineering: case study of Xinglin sea-crossing bridge,Xiamen
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着海岸带地区经济的发展、人口的增加和城市化程度的加快,日益增多的各类海洋工程已经或者正在损害海洋与海岸带生态系统为人类提供各种产品和服务的能力,严重威胁到人类健康和海洋经济的可持续发展。实施海洋生态损害补偿制度,即让生态损害责任方承担生态损害的全部成本,是解决海洋生态损害问题的有效途径之一。建立了海洋工程生态损害评估框架和生态损害补偿标准估算模型,并成功运用于厦门杏林跨海大桥的案例研究。结果表明,在2%的贴现率下,杏林大桥生态补偿标准为1739万元,远高于政府实际征收的补偿金额600万元。该评估框架信息需求量小,成本低且简单易行,在小规模海洋工程的生态损害评估与补偿方面有良好的应用前景。 With fast economic growth, population increase, and urbanization in coastal zones, an increasing number of marine engineering projects have diminished or are diminishing the capacity of ocean and coastal ecosystems to provide goods and services for mankind, threatening the health of local populations and the sustainable development of marine economies. To prevent marine ecological incentives, such as marine ecological damage damage and to ensure sustainable development in coastal regions, market-based compensation (MEDC), have been introduced due to their high efficiency and flexibility. The basic premise of this approach is to make the responsible parties pay the full costs associated with the ocean space development activities, i.e., the ocean users should pay the private costs as well as the cost ecological damage, so that excessive development activities can be curbed. While there are many studies ecological damage and compensation of spills of oil or other hazardous substances, coastal reclamation or wetland there have been few attempts in the academic community to research the ecological damage of mill'iRe about the drainage, of marine engineering such as the construction of a sea-crossing bridge and marine culture. In practice, marine engineering gets approval from the relevant govemment agencies, and pays fees for the use of sea areas However, these damages are typically long lasting and , which may make them ignore ecological have considerable cumulative effects on damage compensation marine habitats andenvironment. Thus, the development of a framework for ecological urgently needed, to ensure the marine ecosystems been compensated damage assessment caused by marine engineering is This paper presents a framework for ecological damage assessment and a model for standard. The value of ecosystem services in the affected sea area and the severity of damage the development of a MEDC to various ecosystem services in various sea area use patterns related to the marine engineering are systematically assembled in the established model. The established framework and model are employed in the Xinglin sea-crossing bridge, Xiamen. Results show that the ecological damage and therefore the ecological damage compensation of Xinglin sea-crossing bridge is I7.39 million yuan with the discount rate 2%. The amount of ecological damage is 12.76 million yuan even with a high more than the amount of compensation, 6 million yuan, which municipality needs to re-examine its compensation standard to reflect collect enough money to restore the damaged ecosystems was actually discount rate, 4%, which is far by local government. Xiamen the real damage of marine engineering and to ensure to
出处 《生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第16期5467-5476,共10页 Acta Ecologica Sinica
基金 国家海洋局海洋公益性行业科研专项项目"海洋工程和海上溢油生态补偿/赔偿关键技术研究示范"(#201105006)
关键词 海洋工程 生态补偿 损害评估 杏林大桥 marine engineering ecological compensation damage assessment Xinling sea-crossing bridge
  • 相关文献

参考文献46

  • 1[J].World Resource Institute.Pilot Analysis of Global Ecosystems:Coastal Ecosystems.Washington,DC:WRI Publication,2001.
  • 2Pernetta J,Elder D,Humphrey S.Cross-Sectoral,Integrated Coastal Area Planning (CICAP):Guidelines and Principles for Coastal Area Development.Gland,Switzerland:International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN),1993.
  • 3Carson R T,Mitchell R C,Hanemann W M,Kopp R J,Presser S,Ruud P A.Contingent Valuation and Lost Passive Use:Damages from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill.Environmental and Resource Economics,2003,25(3):257-286.
  • 4Cohen M J.Technological disasters and natural resource damage assessment:an evaluation of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.Land Economics,1995,71(1):65-82.
  • 5Mason M.Civil liability for oil pollution damage:examining the evolving scope for environmental compensation in the international regime.Marine Policy,2003,27(1):1-12.
  • 6McCay D P F,Whittier N,Ward M,Santos C.Spill hazard evaluation for chemicals shipped in bulk using modeling.Environmental Modelling&Software,2006,21(2):156-169.
  • 7Ronza A,Lázaro-Touza L,Carol S,Casal J.Economic valuation of damages originated by major accidents in port areas.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2009,22(5):639-648.
  • 8李亚楠,张燕,马成东.我国海洋灾害经济损失评估模型研究[J].海洋环境科学,2000,19(3):60-63. 被引量:34
  • 9张继伟,杨志峰,汤军健,陈楚汉.基于环境风险的海洋生态补偿标准研究[J].海洋环境科学,2010,29(5):751-757. 被引量:15
  • 10李京梅,曹婷婷.HEA方法在我国溢油海洋生态损害评估中的应用[J].中国渔业经济,2011,29(3):80-86. 被引量:7

二级参考文献174

共引文献531

同被引文献307

引证文献19

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部