期刊文献+

应用防旋股骨近端髓内钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折效果分析 被引量:3

Effect analysis of applicating proximal femoral nail anti -rotation(PFNA)in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:对股骨粗隆间骨折患者应用防旋股骨近端髓内钉(PFNA)临床治疗效果进行评价分析。方法选取40例股骨粗隆间骨折患者,应用 PFNA 内固定治疗,观察手术时间、术中出血量、骨折临床愈合时间、术后髋关节功能恢复程度、术后并发症。结果手术时间为60~120 min,平均(90.0±12.5)min;术中出血量200~600 mL,平均(380.8±58.0)mL;骨折临床愈合时间8~15周,平均(10.7±3.4)周;髋关节功能根据 Harris 评分,总体优良率92.5%;术后无并发症发生。结论PFNA 适用于各种类型粗隆间骨折,尤其适合老年人骨质疏松型骨折,具有操作简便、创伤小、固定牢固、骨折愈合快、并发症少等优点,值得临床推广使用。 Objective To evaluate the treatment effect of PFNA clinical analysis in patients with intertro-chanteric fracture application.Methods 40 cases of intertrochanteric fractures PFNA internal fixation treatment were selected,the operation time,intraoperative blood loss and fractures healing time,degree of hip joint function recovery after operation and the postoperative complications were observed.Results Operating time was 60 -120minutes,with an average of (90.0 ±12.5)minutes.Intraoperative blood loss volume was 200 -600mL,and the average volume was 380.8 plus or minus 58 ml.Fracture clinical healing time was 8 to 15 weeks,with an average of (10.5 ±2.5)weeks. According to Harris hip joint function score,the overall good rate was 85.5%.There were no postoperative complica-tions occurred.Conclusion PFNA applies to all types of intertrochanteric fractures,especially for the old type osteo-porosis bone fracture,which with simple operation,small trauma,fixed firmly,fracture healing fast and less complica-tions.It is worthy of clinical use.
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2015年第16期2509-2512,共4页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词 股骨粗隆间骨折 骨钉 骨折固定术 Intertrochanteric fractures Bone nail Fracture fixationInternal
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献77

共引文献491

同被引文献39

  • 1张伟强,祁宝昌,邓鹏飞,陈登山,杨田野,孙大辉.老年股骨粗隆间骨折治疗的临床进展[J].中国老年学杂志,2015,35(1):266-268. 被引量:100
  • 2Simmermacher RK, Bosch AM, Van der Werken C. The AO/ASIF- proximal femoral nail ( PFN ) : a new device for the treatment of unsta- ble proximal femoral fractures[J].Injury, 1999,30( 5 ) :327-332.
  • 3Honkonen SE, Vihtonen K, Jarvinen MJ. Second-generation cepha- lomedullary nails in the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanterie fractures of the proximal femur [J]. Injury, 2004,35 ( 2 ) : 179-183.
  • 4Haidukewych GJ, Israel TA, Berry DJ. Reverse obliquity fractures of the intertrochanteric region of the femur[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001,83-A(5 ) :643-650.
  • 5Min WK, Kim SY, Kim TK, et al. Proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fracturtes compared with Gamma nail[ J]. J Trauma,2007,63 (5) : 1054-1060.
  • 6Barton TM, Gleeson R, Topliss C, ct al. A comparison of the long gamma nail with the sliding hip screw for the treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 fractures of the proximal part of the femur: a prospective ran- domized trial[ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am ,2010,92 (4) :792-798.
  • 7Parker M J, Handoll HH. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramed- ullary nails versus extramedullary implants tot cxtraeapsular hip frac- tures in adults[ J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev ,2004,1 : CD000093.
  • 8Sadowski C, Lubbeke A, Saudan M, et al. Treatnent of reverse ob- lique and transverse intertrochanteric fraetures with use of an intr- amedullary nail or a 95 degrees screw-plate: a prospective, random- ized study [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2002,84-A ( 3 ) : 372-381.
  • 9Ma JX, Wang J, Xu WG, ct al. Biomechanical outcome of proximal femoral nail antirotation is superior to proximal femoral locking ,com- pression plate for reverse oblique intertrochanterie fractures: a biome- chanical study of intertrochanteric fractures[J]. Acta Orthop Trauma- tol Ture ,2015,49 (4) :426-432.
  • 10Simmermacher RK, Ljungqvist J, Bail H, et al. The new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in daily practice: results of a multi-centre clinical study[ J]. Injury,2008,39 (8) :932-939.

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部