期刊文献+

基于Stackelberg博弈的软件提供商竞争策略:SaaS vs.SWS 被引量:2

Competitive Strategies of Software Vendors Based on Stackelberg Game: SaaS vs. SWS
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了明晰企业用户对网络存储数据敏感性行为、企业用户转移成本、软件市场网络外部性特征及不同软件交付模式Saa S和SWS的差异对软件提供商竞争策略的影响,从消费者效用角度入手,构建了基于Stackelberg博弈的SWS提供商与Saa S提供商竞争模型。通过采用比较静态分析方法,揭示了外生变量变化对模型均衡解的影响。研究结果表明:存储数据敏感型企业用户比例、转移成本、Saa S模式下企业用户实施成本、竞争双方网络外部性强度的提高对Saa S提供商将会产生不利影响;而前两个外生变量的提高对SWS提供商具有正向的促进作用。同时,考虑到两种模式下企业用户实施成本差异以及SWS自身网络外部性强度对其均衡利润的作用会受到转移成本阈值的影响,因此,对SWS提供商而言,不能一味地降低其客户实施成本或提高自身网络外部性强度。 In order to clarify the effects of customer's behavior about the stored data-sensitive, the switc- hing cost, the network externality, the product differentiation between SaaS (software as a service) and SWS (shrink-wrap sofftware) on the competitive strategies of software vendors, a competitive model be- tween SaaS vendor and SWS vendor based on stackelberg game is constructed from the perspective of con- sumer utility. A comparative statics analysis is presented to show how changes in exogenous variables affect the equilibrium solution. The results show that the proportion of stored data-sensitive customer, switching cost, customer's implementation cost of SaaS, the intension of network externality of the two parities have a negative effect on SaaS vendor, while the first two exogenous variables have a positive effect on SWS. But as the role of customer's implementation cost differentiation between SaaS and SWS and the intension of network externality of SWS on the profits of SWS will be subject to a cutoff value of switching cost, it is proposed that SWS vendor can not blindly decrease the implementation cost or increase the intension of net- work externality.
出处 《工业工程》 2015年第4期9-15,共7页 Industrial Engineering Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71172072)
关键词 转移成本 网络外部性 数据敏感性 软件即服务(SaaS) 传统套装软件(SWS) switching cost network externality data-sensitive software as a service (SaaS) shrink-wrap software (SWS)
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1杨善林,罗贺,丁帅.基于云计算的多源信息服务系统研究综述[J].管理科学学报,2012,15(5):83-96. 被引量:86
  • 2中国IDC圈.2011年至2020年全球云计算发展趋势[EB/OL].[2014-10-22].http://cloud.idcquan.com/yzx/24730.shtml.
  • 3Kaplan J. Sorting through software as a service [ EB/OL]. [ 2014-10-28 ]. http://www, networkworld, com/article! 2315890/software/sorting-through-software-as-a-service. ht- ml.
  • 4Wu W W. Mining significant factors affecting the adoption of SaaS using the rough set approach [ J ]. The Journal of Sys- tems and software, 2011, 84(3) : 435-441.
  • 5Tyrvainen P, Selin J. How to sell SaaS: a model for main factors of marketing and selling software as a service [ C ]. Software Business: Second International Conference, IC- SOB2011, Belgium:Brussels, 2011: 6.
  • 6Chou D C, Chou A Y. Analysis of a new information systems outsourcing practice: software as a service business model [ J ]. International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, 2007, 2(4): 392-405.
  • 7Misra S C, Mondal A. Identification of a companyg suitabili- ty for the adoption of cloud computing and modelling its cor- responding return on investment [ J ]. Mathematical and Com- puter Modelling, 2011, 53(3-4): 504-521.
  • 8Mccullagh K. Data sensitivity : proposals for resolving the co- nundrum [J]. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 2007,2 (4): 190-201.
  • 9Mowbray M, Pearson S. A Client-based privacy manager for cloud computing[ C]. New York : ACM Press, 2009.
  • 10孟凡生,尹鹏.SaaS模式供应链管理系统RTCO模型研究[J].南京理工大学学报,2011,35(1):150-154. 被引量:4

二级参考文献52

  • 1张依敏.解惑TCO[J].多媒体世界,2007(12):20-21. 被引量:1
  • 2王利艳,王喜成.基于TCO的ERP选型[J].商场现代化,2004(10):55-56. 被引量:2
  • 3王利艳,王喜成.关于TCO用于ERP选型的探讨[J].桂林电子工业学院学报,2005,25(3):93-96. 被引量:3
  • 4楚扬杰,王先甲,吴秀君,方德斌.供应链信息共享的道德风险研究[J].武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版),2006,28(2):86-88. 被引量:21
  • 5Caminal R. ,and Matute C., 1989, "Endogenous Switching Costs in a Duopoly Model", Journal oflndustrial Organization, vol. 8, 353-- 373.
  • 6Chen Y., 1997, "Paying Customers to Switch", Journal of Econamics and Management Strategy, vol. 6, 877--897.
  • 7Chen Y., 2005, "Oligopoly Price Discrimination by Purchase History", The Pros and Cons of Price Discrimination, 101--29.
  • 8Doganoglu T., and Grzybowski L., 2004, "Dynamic Duopoly Competition with Switching Costs and Network Externalities", Mimeo.
  • 9Farrell J., and Klemperer P., 2002, "Coordination and Lock--In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects", Handbook of Industrial Organization.
  • 10Fudenberg J., and Tirole J., 2000, "Customer Poaching and Brand Switching", Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 31, 634--657.

共引文献180

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部