基于第三方认证的社会性规制:一个合作治理的视角被引量：9

导出

摘要政府规制部门由于缺乏足够的资源来监督违规行为,进而导致规制失败。如果在社会性规制中引入第三方认证,通过被规制企业聘请独立的第三方来验证其合规性,并促使其合规,便能够更好地实现规制目标。然而,第三方认证既有其优势,也隐藏着问题,主要表现为当私营部门行使本应是公共部门职能的时候能否保证问责制的实施,而且能否使公共利益得到保护。因此,政府规制部门需要制定和实施一些约束认证机构的制度,包括被规制企业如何选择认证机构,认证如何执行等。有了设计良好的制度和强有力的政府监督,第三方认证才能够更有利于社会性规制的实施。

作者李军超

机构地区河南财经政法大学公共管理学院

出处《江西社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第7期237-243,共7页 Jiangxi Social Sciences

基金国家社科基金项目"东中西部义务教育均等化调查研究"(12CGL109) 国家社科基金青年项目"义务教育资源配置的绩效评估及优化:模型构建与经验分析"(CFA130156) 河南财经政法大学青年学术创新骨干支持项目"义务教育资源配置的绩效评估及优化"

关键词第三方认证私有化社会性规制合作治理

分类号 C916 [经济管理] D630 [政治法律—中外政治制度]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献11

1Eugene Bardach,Social Regulation as a Generic Policy Instrument,in Beyond Privatization:The Tools of Government Action 198,Lester Salmon,ed.,2002.
2Victor B.Flatt&Paul M.Collins.,Environmental Enforcement in Dire Straits:There is No Protection for Nothing and No Data for Free,85 NOTRE DAME L.REV.55,86,2010.
3William J.Novak,Public-Private Governance:A Historical Introduction,in Government by Contracting:Outsourcing and American Democracy,Harvard University Press,2009.
4Jody Freeman,Extending Public Law Norms through Privatization,116HARV.L.R.1285,1286-87,2002-2003;Jody Freeman,The Private Role in Public Governance,75 N.Y.U.L.REV.543,549,2000.
5樊根耀.第三方认证制度及其作用机制研究[J].生产力研究,2007(2):18-20. 被引量：21
6张锐.第三方认证机构在我国的发展[J].北方经济,2008(4):89-90. 被引量：5
7张会恒.规制影响评估研究进展[J].经济学动态,2010(1):97-101. 被引量：10
8曾广录,李映辉.论公共产品供给中政府规制的价值逻辑[J].求索,2013(1):189-191. 被引量：11
9樊慧玲.政府社会性规制与企业社会责任耦合的模式选择[J].管理现代化,2013,33(5):1-3. 被引量：2
10Martha Minow,Public and Private Partnerships:Accounting for the New Religion,116 HARV.L.R.1229,1230,2002-2003.

二级参考文献44

1Kirkpatrick & Zhang (2004), "Regulatory impact assessment in developing and transition economies", Centre on Regulation and Competition Working Paper Series, No. 83.
2Kirkpatrick, C. (2001), "Regulatory impact assessment in developing countries", Centre on Regulation and Competition Working Paper Series, No. 5.
3Kirkpatrick, Parker & Zhang (2004), "Regulatory impact assessment in developing and transition economies", Centre on Regulation and Competition Working Paper Series, No. 83.
4Lee, N. (2002), "Developing and applying regulatory impact assessment methodologies in low and middle income countries", Paper for the Regulatory Impact Assessment Meeting.
5Leonardi & Cantone(2008), "Impact assessment and multi -level governance.. A comparison between Italy and the United Kingdom", NBER Working Paper No. 17.
6OECD (1997), Regulatory Impact Analysis: Best Practice in OECD Countries, Paris.
7OECD( 1999), Regulatory Reform in Mexico, Paris.
8OECD(2000), Regulatory Reform in Korea, Paris.
9OECD(2002), Regulatory Policies in OECD countries, Paris.
10Radaelli, C. M. (2002), "The politics of regulatory impact analysis in the OECD countries", mimeo, Bradford: University of Bradford.