摘要
【目的】研究Web3.0快速发展背景下,科技期刊同行评议改进与发展的新平台、新模式。【方法】以Peerage of Science和Frontier为案例,针对最新的基于社交网络平台的同行评议模式进行了分析,介绍了该同行评议模式的改进、特点、流程、工作方式等。【结果】在社交网络平台下,同行评议从静态变为动态,从"一对一"变成"一对多",从封闭式评议变成开放式评价。【结论】基于社交网络的同行评议模式是同行评议发展的最新趋势,可为我国的同行评议发展提供参考。
[ Purposes ] This paper studies the new forms and new platforms for journal peer review process with the rapid development of Web3.0. [ Methods ] Based on the two cases of Peerage of Science and Frontiers, this paper analyzes the latest peer review systems based on social network platform, and mainly introduces the evaluation of the system characteristics, review processes, and work mechanism and so on. [ Findings ] Based on a social network platform, the journal peer review process becomes dynamic, and becomes more open and transparent. [ Conclusions ] Peer review platforms based on social network are the new trend of the development of the peer review, and we should pay more attention to them.
出处
《中国科技期刊研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第9期935-940,共6页
Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals
基金
中国科学院兰州文献情报中心业务领域前瞻项目资助与中国科学院科学出版基金专项“资源环境科技期刊集群建设试点”联合资助
关键词
社交网络
公开评价
同行评议
科技期刊
Social network
Open review
Peer review
Scientific journal
