摘要
【目的】探讨异地终审会提高科技期刊学术质量和影响力的效果。【方法】2015年4-6月,在总结《中国实用妇科与产科杂志》8年来异地终审会效果的基础上,通过查阅既往文献,比较异地终审会与本地终审会的差异,以及异地终审会在提高期刊学术质量及影响力方面的优势。【结果】与本地终审会相比,异地终审会专家学科知识涵盖更全面,可减小审稿的地域局限性;减轻本地编委终审压力,调动异地编委审稿积极性;更加强了编辑部与编委的沟通和联系;扩大了期刊的学术质量和影响力,提高了被引频次和影响因子。【结论】异地终审会可以达到提高期刊学术质量和影响力的目的。
[ Purposes] The objective is to investigate the final review of papers in different places and improve the academic quality and the influence of scientific journals. [Methods] Between April and June 2015, this paper is on the basis of summarizing the results of final review of papers in different places in Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics eight years ago. It reviews previous literature and compares the differences between the final review of papers in different places with the local final review and the advantage of improving the academic quality and the influence of scientific journals in final review of papers in different places. [indings] Compared with the local final review, the subject knowledge of different final experts is more comprehensive which reduces the local limitation of review and reduces the pressure of the local editorial board and aroused the enthusiasm of the different places＇ editorial boards . It strengthens the relationship of the editorial department and the editorial board member. It expands the academic quality of journals and their influence and improves the cited frequency and impact factor. [ Conclusions ] Final review of papers in different places aims at promoting the academic quality and the influence of scientific journals,
出处
《中国科技期刊研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第9期956-959,共4页
Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals
关键词
《中国实用妇科与产科杂志》
终审会
期刊质量
影响力
Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics
Final review of papers
Journal quality
Influence
