期刊文献+

胃癌根治术后腹腔热灌注化疗联合XELOX方案的临床效果观察 被引量:8

Clinical efficacy of hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion chemotherapy combined with XELOX chemotherapy in treatment of gastric cancer after radical surgery
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察胃癌根治术后腹腔热灌注化疗联合奥沙利铂(OXA)+卡培他滨(Xeloda)(XELOX方案)辅助化疗的临床疗效与安全性。方法 2011年1月—2012年3月收治胃癌术后患者112例,按术后治疗方法分为观察组(54例)和对照组(58例),观察组术后给予腹腔热灌注化疗(顺铂+5-氟尿嘧啶)2~3次,2周后予XELOX 4周期化疗方案;对照组术后仅予XELOX 4周期化疗方案。比较2组化疗期间药物毒性反应,化疗结束后30 d采血检测肿瘤标志物[癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖蛋白抗原19-9(CA19-9)]水平,随访观察患者复发率、转移率与3年生存率。结果观察组化疗后30 d CEA水平为(4.2±2.0)μg/L,CA19-9水平为(19.7±6.5)U/ml,对照组分别为(7.1±3.1)μg/L、(37.4±15.1)U/ml,均显著低于治疗前(P<0.01),且治疗后观察组水平明显低于对照组(U=5.923、8.153,P<0.01)。观察组特异性毒性反应主要为腹膜刺激症状40例(18.5%),明显高于对照组的2例(3.4%)(x^2=6.639,P=0.010),其余药物毒性反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组随访期内复发率为13.5%、远处转移率为19.3%,均低于对照组的32.1%、30.4%,其中复发率差异有统计学意义(x^2=5.267,P=0.022)。观察组3年生存率为77.8%,明显高于对照组的58.6%(x^2=4.705,P=0.030)。结论胃癌根治术后在行XELOX方案辅助化疗基础上,联合行腹腔热灌注化疗能进一步杀灭脱落癌细胞,降低肿瘤复发与远处转移率,延长远期生存时间,不良反应轻微可控。 Objective To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of the gastric cancer radical postoperative intraperi toneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy combined with oxaliplatin (OXA) +capecitabine (Xeloda) (XELOX regimen) adjuvant chemotherapy .Methods From 2011 January to 2012 March, 112 cases gastric cancer patients were enrolled , ac-cording to the method of postoperative treatment , they were divided into observation group (54 cases) and control group (58 cases).Patients in the observation group were given chemotherapy of intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy (cisplatin +fluorouracil) 2-3 times, 2 weeks later were given XELOX for 4 cycles of chemotherapy;after surgery, in the control group , patients only received XELOX for 4 cycles of chemotherapy .Compared chemotherapy drug toxicity of the 2 group, after 30 days of chemotherapy , blood samples were collected to detect tumor marker [ carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA19-9)] level.All the patients were followed up to observe the recurrence rate , metas-tasis rate and 3 years survival rate .Results In the observation group after chemotherapy , after 30 days ’ CEA levels was (4.2 ±2.0)μg/L, CA19-9 level was (19.7 ±6.5) U /ml.The control group were (7.1 ±3.1)μg/L, (37.4 ±15.1) U/ml respectively, all were significantly lower than before treatment ( P 〈0.01), and observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group ( U =5.923, U =8.153, P 〈0.01).Observation group’s specific toxicity mainly was perito-neal irritation symptoms with 40 cases (18.5%), which was significantly higher than that of control group ’s 2 cases (3.4%) (χ2 =6.639, P =0.010), the rest of the drug toxicity showed no statistical significance differences ( P 〉0.05).Observa-tion group’s rate of recurrence during the follow-up period was 13.5%, metastasis rate was 19.3%, which were lower than the control group’s 32.1%and 30.4%.The difference of the recurrence rate was statistically significant (χ2 =5.267, P =0.022).The observation group’s 3 years survival rate was 77.8%, which was significantly higher than the control group ’s 58.6%(χ2 =4.705, P =0.030).Conclusion After radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer , combined with XELOX regimen&amp;nbsp;adjuvant chemotherapy and intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy can further kill off cancer cells , reduce tumor recurrence and metastasis rate , prolong the long-term survival time , adverse reactions are mild and controllable .
出处 《疑难病杂志》 CAS 2015年第10期1043-1046,共4页 Chinese Journal of Difficult and Complicated Cases
关键词 胃癌根治术 腹腔热灌注化疗 XELOX化疗方案 肿瘤标志物 复发率 生存率 Gastrectomy Peritoneal perfusion chemotherapy XELOX regimen Tumor markers Recurrence rate Survival rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献106

共引文献152

同被引文献134

  • 1谢景军.腹腔镜下胃癌根治术治疗老年进展期胃癌的近远期疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(7):1845-1846. 被引量:12
  • 2张海洋,杨玉兵,王建锋,宋展,王耿泽.腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术50例临床疗效分析[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(1):218-219. 被引量:14
  • 3WU J, WAXMAN D J. Metronomic cyclophosphamide schedule-de- pendence of innate immune cell recruitment and tumor regression in an implanted glioma model [ J ]. Cancer Lett,2014,353 (2) :272-280.
  • 4CUI C ,MAO L,CHI Z ,et al. A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled muhicenter trim of endostar in patients with meta- static melanoma[,l~. Mol Ther,2013,21 (7) :1456-1463.
  • 5鲁亚晶,白玉贤.晚期胃癌分子靶向治疗的新进展[J/CD].中华临床医师杂志:电子版,2013,7(21):9724-9727.
  • 6MOSCHOS S J, ODOUX C, LAND S R,et aI. Endostatin plus inter- femn-alpha2b therapy for metastatic melanoma: a novel combination of antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory agents [ J~. Melanoma Res, 2007,17 ( 3 ) : 193-200.
  • 7AKOPIANS AL,PISARSKA MD,WANG ET.The role of inflammatory pathways in implantation failure:chronic endometritis and hydrosalpinges[J].Semin Reprod Med,2015,33(4):298-304.
  • 8SU S,TAO G,DONG B,et al.Delayed presentation of uterine perforation with ovary migration after dilatation and curettage[J].Int J Clin Exp Med.2015,8(4):6-6311.
  • 9Timmermans C,Doffagne E,Venet D,et al. Statistical monitoring of data quality and consistency in the Stomach Cancer Adjuvant Multi-institutional Trial Group Trial [J]. Gastric Cancer, 2016,19(1) : 24-30.
  • 10Lim HS, Cho GS, Park YH, et al. Comparison of Quality of Life and Nutritional Status in Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Gastrectomies [J]. Clin Nutr Res, 2015,4 (3) : 153-159.

引证文献8

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部