2Ropers D,Baum U,Pohle K,et al:Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction.Circulation,2013,107:664.
3Pinto FJ,Chenzbraun A,Botas J,et al:Feasibility of serial intracoronary ultrasound imaging for assessment of progression of intimal proliferation in cardiac transplant recipients.Circulation,2014,90:2348.
4Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology:first experience. Eur Heart J, 2005,26 : 1482-1487.
5Mollet N, Cademartiri F, van Mieghen CA, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation ,2005,23:2318-2323.
6Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation, 1975,51 (4 Suppl) 4:5-40.
7Leber AW, Knez A, Von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstruetive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography.J Am Coll Cardiol,2005,46 : 147-154.
8Raft GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol,2005,46 : 552-557.
9Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64- slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population-comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J, 2006,70:564-571.
10Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol, 2006,98 : 145-148.
