Lower Intermediate Readers and Their Use of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies
Lower Intermediate Readers and Their Use of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies
摘要
Despite much research done on strategy, there still exist several questions unanswered. Not much research is done to examine lower intermediate English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners' performance on the reading section of the First Certificate of English exam (FCER) in the post strategy instruction period. The results indicate that learners vary not only in terms of their performance on the FCER, hut also on the employed metacognitive strategy. Furthermore, metacognitive strategies are the only predictors that positively predict learners' performance in the FCER.
参考文献22
-
1Abbott, M. (2006). ESL reading strategies: Differences in Arabic and Mandarin speaker test performance. Language Learning, 56(4), 633-670.
-
2Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: CUP.
-
3Anderson, N. J., Bachman, L., Perkins, K., & Cohen, A. (1991). An exploratory study into the construct validity of a reading comprehension test: Triangulation of data sources. Language Testing, 8(1), 41-66.
-
4Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1989). Discourse analysis (8th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
5Carrell, P. L. (1987). Text as interaction: Some implications of text analysis and reading research for ESL composition. In U. Connor and R. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages analysis of L2 text (pp. 47-56). Longman: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
-
6Carrell, P. L. (1990). Awareness of text structure: Effects on recall. Language Learning, 42(1), 1-20.
-
7Caldwell, J., & Leslie, L. (2010). Thinking aloud in expository text: Processes and outcomes. Journal of Literacy Research, 42, 308-410.
-
8Cohen, A. D., & Upton, T. A. (2007). I want to go back to the text: Response strategies on the reading subtest of the new TOEFL. Language Testing, 24(2), 209-250. doi: 10.1177/0265532207076364.
-
9Duck, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A.E. Farstup and S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
-
10Grenfell, M., & Macaro, E. (2007). Claims and critiques. In A. D. Cohen and E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice (pp. 9-28). Oxford: OUP.
-
1Yoo-Jean Lee.Korean University Students' Use of Metacognitive Strategies for Online Reading Comprehension[J].US-China Foreign Language,2012,10(4):1085-1097.
-
2WANG Juan.Enhancing Reading Ability of Non-English Majors With Metacognitive Strategies in After-Class Reading[J].US-China Foreign Language,2014,12(11):916-922.
-
3Khorami Mohammad,Fathvalizadeh Ali,Mohammadniya Yaser,Seadatee-Shamir.The Role of Metacognitive Strategies on Persian Students' Vocabulary Learning[J].Psychology Research,2013,3(5):270-275.
-
4李响.认知策略在大学生词汇学习中的运用[J].科技信息,2010(24):181-181.
-
5张丽君.在网络学习环境中学习者运用认知策略刍议[J].辽宁教育行政学院学报,2008,25(7):173-174.
-
6余永川.试论元认知策略与初中英语教学[J].中小学电教(下),2012(1):38-39.
-
7周献珍.基于问题解决的高职校信息技术课堂教学的实践与探索[J].信息系统工程,2014,27(11):159-160. 被引量:2
-
8姜佳婧.An Evaluation of An Intermediate Course in Writing[J].校园英语,2012(13):70-71.
-
9罗兆卿.再议生物课堂上的“人为联想”[J].软件(教育现代化)(电子版),2014,4(02Z):315-315.
-
10张小军.谈学习者视角下的高中数学认知策略[J].数学教学通讯(中等教育),2014(2):36-37. 被引量:2