期刊文献+

一种基于群组判断离差的偏好集结方法 被引量:3

An aggregation approach of preference information according to dispersion of group judgments
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对群决策偏好集结中违反Pareto最优性的情况,设计一种基于群组判断几何离差的同质性集结方法.该方法在集结前进行几何离差测试,以确定个体决策信息的离差水平.离差较小时,可基于几何平均集结;对于离差较大且修正复杂度较高的决策信息,采用主成分分析(PCA)从高维决策信息中提取大多数相关信息,在不依赖主观分析的情况下进行加权集结.仿真实验表明,所提出的方法能够在不违背Pareto最优性的基础上集结离差较大的群决策信息. Aiming at the issue of violation of Pareto optimality in the preference aggregation of group decision, a method of homogeneous aggregation based on the geometric dispersion of group judgments is designed. In the method, a dispersion test is carried out to measure the dispersion level of group judgments, and the aggregation is explored based on the dispersion level. For the judgments with the lower dispersion level, it is proposed to combine the judgments with the geometric mean;for the judgments with the higher dispersion level, which are difficult to revise, the principal components analysis(PCA) is applied to capture the majority of the information associated with the original high dimensionality judgments from diversity of opinion, and combine the group judgments according to the weighted geometric mean without subjective analysis. The simulation experiments show that the proposed method can combine the group judgments with the biggish dispersion on the premise of the Pareto optimality principle.
出处 《控制与决策》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第11期1960-1966,共7页 Control and Decision
基金 装备维修科学研究与改革项目(2012171)
关键词 离差 几何平均集结 群组判断 同质性水平 主成分分析 dispersion aggregation with geometric mean group judgment significance level principal components analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1徐玖平,陈建中.群决策理论与方法及实现[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2009.324,332.
  • 2孙世权,高淑萍,梁原,边疆.基于数据融合技术的多属性群决策方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2012,34(10):2094-2097. 被引量:3
  • 3陈可,陈晓红.一种基于区间数判断矩阵的加权AIP群决策方法[J].控制与决策,2009,24(9):1402-1405. 被引量:8
  • 4Condon E, Golden B, Wasil E. Visualizing group decisions in the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Computers and Operations Research, 2003, 30(10): 1435-1445.
  • 5Groselj P, Zadnik Stirn L. Acceptable consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in analytic hierarchy process[J]. European I of Operational Research, 2012, 223(2): 417-420.
  • 6Aczel J, Saaty T L. Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgments[J]. J of Mathematical Psychology, 1983, 27(1): 93-102.
  • 7Ramanathan R, Ganesh L S. Group preference aggregation methods employed in the AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving member's weightages[J]. European J of Operational Research, 1994, 79(2): 249-265.
  • 8Saaty T L, Vargas L G. Dispersion of group judgments[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2007, 46(7/8): 918-925.
  • 9Zhu B, Xu Z S. Stochastic preference analysis in numerical preference relations[J]. European J of Operational Research, 2014, 237(2): 628-633.
  • 10Zhu B, Xu Z S. Analytic hierarchy process-hesitant group decision making[J]. European J of Operational Research, 2014, 239(3): 794-801.

二级参考文献30

共引文献45

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部