期刊文献+

基于冠状动脉CTA的血流储备分数评估心肌缺血Meta分析 被引量:6

Fractional flow reserve based on coronary CTA on evaluation of myocardial ischaemia:Meta-anlysis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨基于冠状动脉CTA的血流储备分数(FFRCT)评估心肌缺血的准确性。方法检索2004年1月—2015年2月Pubmed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、万方数据知识资源系统关于FFRCT在评估心肌缺血准确性方面的文献,对符合纳入条件的文献行进一步质量评估以及异质性检验。汇总敏感度和特异度,通过汇总工作特征曲线(SROC)和曲线下面积(AUC)评价采用FFRCT诊断心肌缺血的临床价值。结果共纳入4篇文献,质量分级均为A级。纳入研究的总患者数为662例,血管1117条。FFRCT在患者及血管水平汇总后的敏感度分别为0.90(95%CI 0.85~0.93)和0.83(95%CI 0.78~0.87);特异度分别为0.72(95%CI 0.67~0.76)和0.78(95%CI 0.75~0.81);诊断比值比(DOR)分别为24.34(95%CI 10.84~54.65)和21.09(95%CI 7.51~59.24),AUC分别为0.9415、0.9140。结论 FFRCT能有效提高冠状动脉CTA对心肌缺血的诊断准确性。 Objective To explore the accuracy of fractional flow reserve based on coronary CTA(FFRCT)on evaluation of myocardial ischaemia.Methods English and Chinese literature about the diagnostic accuracy of FFRCTfor evaluation of myocardial ischaemia from Jan.2004 to Feb.2015 were searched in Pumed,Cochrane library,Ebase,CNKI,CBM,Wandfang database.The quality and heterogeneity of the literature,which was eligible for Meta-anlysis,was assessed.And then the sensitivity and specificity were pooled to draw the summary ROC curve and obtain the area under summary ROC curve(AUC).Results Totally 4studies were included,examining 662 patients and 1117 vessels.The pooled sensitivity,specificity,diagnostic odds ratio(DOR)and AUC for FFRCT were 0.90(95%CI 0.85—0.93),0.72(95%CI0.67—0.76),24.34(95%CI 10.84—54.65),0.9415 at the patient-level,and 0.83(95%CI 0.78—0.87),0.78(95%CI0.75—0.81),21.09(95%CI 7.51—59.24),0.9140 at the vessel-level.Conclusion FFRCTcan be used to improve the diagnostic accuracy of coronary CTA for myocardial ischemia.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第11期1661-1665,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 体层摄影术 X线计算机 冠状动脉血管造影术 血流储备分数 心肌缺血 Tomography X-ray computed Coronary angiography Fractional flow reserve Myocardial ischemia
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Pijls NH, Tanaka N, Fearon WF. Functional assessment of coro- nary stenoses: Can we live without it? Eur Heart J, 2013, 34 (18) :1335-1344.
  • 2Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary interven- tion in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiog- raphy for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2010,56(3) : 177-184.
  • 3Pijls NH, Van Sehaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Pereuta- neous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant steno- sis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007,49(21) :2105-2111.
  • 4Li J, Elrashidi MY, Flammer AJ, et al. Long-term outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided vs. angiography-guided percutane- ous coronary intervention in contemporary practice. Eur Heart J, 2013,34(18) : 1375-1383.
  • 5Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, Van Pelt N, et al. Compre- hensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: Computed tomo- graphy coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angi- ography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2008,52(8):636-643.
  • 6Nissen SE. Limitations of computed tomography coronary angiog- raphy. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008,52(25):2145-2147.
  • 7祁小龙,罗文韬,季文彬,杨长青.冠状动脉血流储备分数研究进展[J].中国医学影像技术,2013,29(5):818-821. 被引量:4
  • 8Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK. Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantifi- cation of fractional flow reserve: Scientific basis. J Am Coll Car- diol, 2013,61 (22) : 2233-2241.
  • 9Whiting PF, Weswood ME, Rutjes AW, et al. Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accura- cy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2006,6 : 9.
  • 10Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causingcoronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve compu- ted from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Frac- tional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2011, 58(19) : 1989-1997.

二级参考文献19

  • 1李勇,任法新,方毅民,杨军,刘少荣,王桂乐.临界血流储备分数指导中度冠状动脉病变治疗的临床价值[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(9):2704-2706. 被引量:9
  • 2林运,白净.,冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病预防研究现状.中阚循证心皿管医学杂志,2009,1(4):252-253.
  • 3Hamilos M, Peace A, Kochiadakis G, et al. Fractional flow re- serve: An indispensable diagnostic tool in the cardiac catheterisa tion laboratory. Hellenic J Cardiol, 2010,51(2) : 133-141.
  • 4Schelbert HR. FFR and coronary flow reserve: Friends or foes'? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2012,5(2) :203-206.
  • 5Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, et al. Compre- hensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: Computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angi ography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2008,52(8):636-643,.
  • 6Lindstaedt M, Mtigge A. Myocardial fractional flow reserve. Its role in guiding PCI in stable coronary artery disease. Herz, 2011, 36(5) :410-416.
  • 7Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow re serve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary inter- vention. N EnglJ Med, 2009,360(3) :213-224.
  • 8Bech GJ, Droste H, Pijls NH, et al. Value of fractional flow re serve in making decisions about bypass surgery for equivocal left main coronary artery disease. Heart, 2001,86(5) :547-552.
  • 9Kristensen TS, Engstr'bm T, Kelbek H, et al. Correlation be- tween coronary computed tomographie angiography and fraction- al flow reserve. Int J Cardiol, 2010, 144(2):200 205.
  • 10Costa MA, Shoemaker S, Futamatsu H, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance perfusion imaging detects anatomic and phys- iologic coronary artery disease as measured by coronary angiog- raphy and fractional flow reserve. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2007, 50 (6) :514-522.

共引文献3

同被引文献54

引证文献6

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部