摘要
早期的编造、传播虚假信息犯罪侧重于保护个体利益价值,而此后的有关网络诽谤的司法解释和《刑法修正案(九)》更关注一般性的公共秩序价值。刑法中编造、传播虚假信息犯罪的罪名体系初步形成。《刑法修正案(九)》关于编造、传播虚假信息犯罪的条文,虽然进一步扩大了"虚假信息"的范围,严密了刑事法网,但是它回避了有关网络诽谤的司法解释的立法正当性问题,又可能造成虚假恐怖信息与新设的四类虚假信息的界限不明等问题,是一次不完美的立法修正。应有的解决方案是,取消编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪,将《刑法修正案(九)》中的"虚假的险情、疫情、警情、灾情"改为一般性的"虚假信息"。
The crime system of fabricating and spreading false information in criminal law is preliminarily formed. ＂Crim- inal law amendment （9）＂ on fabricating and disseminating the provisions of the crime of false information, which further expanded the scope of ＂false information＂ and closed the criminal justice, but it begs the libel network related judicial interpretation of legislation legitimacy, and which also can cause false terrorist information and new design of four kinds of false information unclear boundaries and other issues, is an imperfect legislative amendments. Proper solutions should be： canceling the crime of fabricating, intentionally spreading false terrorist information; changing ＂false danger, dis- ease, alarm, disaster＂ in the ＂criminal law amendment （9） ＂ to general ＂false information＂.
出处
《重庆邮电大学学报（社会科学版）》
北大核心
2015年第6期39-44,共6页
Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition)
基金
北京市社科联青年人才资助项目:公民个人信息的刑法保护研究(2015SKL019)
关键词
虚假信息犯罪
网络诽谤解释
立法正当性
false information crime
Internet libel interpretation
legislative legitimacy
