期刊文献+

火电厂环境风险评估技术研究 被引量:2

Technical Key Points in Environment Risk Evaluation of Thermal Power Plants
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于对呼和浩特市周边10多家火电厂环境风险评估实际工作经验总结,并依据国家新出台的环境风险评估指南和技术规范,从风险源识别、危害分析以及风险防范措施改进角度提出火电厂环境风险评估的技术要点。环境风险类型包括危险化学品使用、储存和运输环节的突发环境事故,常规污染物非正常排放和处置不当引发的环境污染事故,为电厂行业环境风险评估技术规范的制定和评估报告的编制提供依据。 Based on practical experiences on evaluating environment risk of more than 10 thermal power plants around Huhhot area,some technical key points in environment risk evaluation of thermal power plants were put forward through 3 directions including recognizing risk sources,analyzing hazard and improving precautionary measures. Risk types contained sudden accident caused by hazardous chemicals use and storage,and pollution episode caused by normal pollutants abnormal discharge and mismanage,which can provide references for drawing up technical guidelines and writing reports about environment risk evaluation of thermal power plants.
出处 《环境科学与管理》 CAS 2015年第11期187-190,共4页 Environmental Science and Management
关键词 火电厂 环境风险评估 技术要点 thermal power plants environment risk evaluation technical key points
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献19

  • 1刘宏,唐禹夏,程宇和.基于风险管理方法的危险源评价分级研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2007,17(6):145-150. 被引量:29
  • 2国家环境保护总局.建设项目环境风险评价技术导则(HJ/T-2004)[S].2004.
  • 3LOU Zhengang(娄振纲), WANG Yuangang(王元刚), ZHANG Ji(张吉). Management question and countermeasure analysis of odor pollution to our country[C]//State Key Laboratory of Odor Pollution Control(国家环境保护恶臭污染控制重点实验室). Management and control progress of odor pollutions: Monograph of the 3rd Session of National Odour Pollution Test and Control Technology Seminar (恶臭污染管理与防治技术进展:第三届全国恶臭污染测试与控制技术研讨会论文集), Hangzhou. Tianjin: Tianjin Science and Technology Press, 2010: 271-273.
  • 4HELLER S. Managing industrial risk-Having a tested and proven system to prevent and assess risk[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2006, 130(1/2): 58-65.
  • 5GUY C, PAGE T. Odor impact analysis: Methodology & application[C]//IN Jiang. Proceeding of the 1st IWA International Conference on Odor and VOCs: Measurement, Regulation and Control Techniques Conference Program. Sydney: The University of New South Wales, 2001: 237-244.
  • 6STUART B, ERIKA K. Threshold quantity criteria for risk management programs: recommendations for toxic release[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2003, 105(1/2/3): 39-60.
  • 7Environment Canada. Rationale for the development of a list of regulated substances under CEPA section 200 and their threshold quantities[EB/OL]. (2002-07-15)[2013-03-20]. http://www.ec.gc.ca/lcpe-cepa/default.asp?lang=En&n=8BA5E950-1.
  • 8The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Pocket guide to chemical hazards[EB/OL].[2013-03-20]. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/.
  • 9TRC Environmental Consultants, Inc. Evaluation and assessment of models for emergency response planning prepared for CMA [EB/OL].[2013-12-20]. http://www.ec.gc.ca/lcpe-cepa/default.asp?lang=En&n=8BA5E950-1&offset=19.
  • 10U. S. EPA, Clement Associates. Mathematical models for estimating workplace concentration levels: a literature review[EB/OL].[2013-12-20]. http://www.ec.gc.ca/lcpe-cepa/default.asp?lang=En&n=8BA5E950-1&offset=19.

共引文献14

同被引文献5

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部