期刊文献+

核磁共振(MRI)在胎盘植入产前诊断中的价值探析 被引量:9

The value of MRI in the prenatal diagnosis of placental implantation abnormality
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨核磁共振(MRI)对产前胎盘植入的诊断价值。方法选取2013年1月至2014年12月在郑州大学第一附属医院疑诊为胎盘植入并行MRI检查的患者60例,以术中所见或病理诊断结果为诊断胎盘植入的金标准,回顾性分析MRI对胎盘植入患者的诊断符合率。结果 60例疑诊患者中经确诊胎盘植入49例,经统计学分析发现胎盘植入、粘连型胎盘植入、植入型胎盘植入、穿透型胎盘植入的精确比与Kappa值分别为0.95、0.84;0.95、0.64;0.92、0.81;0.96、0.57。其Kappa值均大于0.4。结论 MRI在胎盘植入产前诊断中的价值值得肯定,可作为产前诊断胎盘植入的重要方法。 Objective To evaluate the value of MRI in the prenatal diagnosis of placental implantation abnormality. Methods 60 patients suspected as placental implantation abnormality and performed by prenatal MRI were selected in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January of 2013 to December of 2014. The gold standard of the diagnosis of placental implantation abnormality was the surgery and pathological diagnosis. The coincidence rate of MRI was retrospectively analyzed. Results 49 abnormal placental implantation patients were conformed in the 60 suspected patients. The statistical analysis showed that the accurate ratio and Kappa values of placental implantation abnormality and placental, adhesive and penetrative placental implantation abnormality, were 0. 95, 0. 84 ; 0. 95, 0. 64 ; 0. 92, 0. 81 ; 0. 96, 0. 57. The kappa values were all greater than O. 4. Conclusion The value of MRI in the diagnosis of abnormal placental implantation is worth affirmation. MRI can be used as an important method for placental implantation abnormality.
出处 《河南医学研究》 CAS 2015年第12期15-17,共3页 Henan Medical Research
关键词 胎盘植入 核磁共振 产前诊断 placental implantation abnormality MRI prenatal diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献72

  • 1张波,罗柏宁,张中伟,谢红宁,孙庚喜.磁共振成像在胎儿检查中的应用价值[J].影像诊断与介入放射学,2004,13(2):69-71. 被引量:3
  • 2应豪,阮晟鸣,王德芬.胎盘植入的诊治进展[J].实用妇产科杂志,2007,23(6):335-336. 被引量:243
  • 3Hequet D, Ricbourg A, Sebbag D, et al. Placenta accreta: screening, management and complications[J]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil, 2013, 41(1): 31-37.
  • 4Steins Bisschop CN, Schaap TP, Vogelvang TE, et al. Invasive placentation and uterus preserving treatment modalities: a systematic review[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2011,284(2): 491-502.
  • 5Aggarwal R, Suneja A, Vaid NB, et al. Morbidly adherent placenta: a critical review[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol India, 2012, 62(1): 57-61.
  • 6Finberg H J, Williams JW. Placenta accreta: prospective sono-graphic diagnosis in patients with placenta previa and prior cesarean section[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 1992, 11 (7): 333-343.
  • 7Sumigama S, Itakura A, Ota T, et al. Placenta previa increta/percreta in Japan: a retrospective study of ultrasound findings, management and clinical course [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2007, 33 (5): 606-611.
  • 8Zizka Z, Beitlov:t P, Hubka P. Accuracy of placenta accreta ultrasound prediction in clinical work[J]. Ceska Gynekol, 2012, 77 (6): 498-501.
  • 9Call G, Giambanco L, Puccio G, et al. Morbidly adherent placenta: evaluation of ultrasound diagnostic criteria and differentiation of placenta accreta from percreta[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 41(4): 406-412.
  • 10Woodring TC, Klauser CK, Bofill JA, et al. Prediction of placenta accreta by ultrasonography and color Doppler imaging[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2011, 24(1): 118-121.

共引文献118

同被引文献63

引证文献9

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部