期刊文献+

句法和语义的对应——语义形式化的基石 被引量:3

Analysis on the Congruence between Syntax and Semantics: Cornerstone of Semantic Formalization
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在我国的语言学界和计算语言学界,缺乏语义分析的形式化已成为中文信息处理的瓶颈问题。要使语义分析形式化,需要建立句法和语义对应的原则,这样能够把句法的可计算性延伸到语义那里。此外,从哲学角度思考,句法和语义的对应显示出一些差异现象。这种"差异"的根源之一在于自然语言中存在的非连续现象。在自然语言某些非连续现象那里,"特异"的语义成分对形成整体的语义来说是非组合的,这就是句法和语义对应的"盲区",也是语义形式化需要关注的地方。 Semantic formalization has been the bottleneck in Chinese Information Processing for both linguistics and computational linguistics in China. For the purpose of semantic formalization, it is necessary to apply the Principle of Synta-semantic Correspondence,which means that the syntactic computationality can be projected onto the semantic computationality. However, in natural language, it is not easy to establish syntax-semantic interface, and the problems are mainly caused by those non-continuous. In these structures, there are some special semantic elements which should be the focus of formal semantics, because they are noncompositional and constitute obstacles for application of the Principle Correspondence.
出处 《湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期55-61,161,共7页 Journal of Hubei University(Philosophy and Social Science)
基金 国家社会科学基金重大招标资助项目:10&ZD073
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Moot, R.Logic of Categorical grammar[M].Berlin : Springer, 2012.
  • 2周强.组合范畴语法CCG和汉语处理[R].中国社科院哲学所学术报告,2012.
  • 3Montague, Richard.Universal Grammar[M]//R.Thomason.Formal Philosophy.New Haven : Yale University Press, 1974.
  • 4Steedman, M.J.Combinatory Grammars and Parasitic Gaps[J].Natural Language and Linguistics Theory, 1987, (6).
  • 5Wood, M.Categorial Grammars[M].London : Routledge, 1993.
  • 6Morrill.Categorial Grammar: Logical Syntax, Semantics, and Processing[M].Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2011.
  • 7Keenan,E.L.Unredueible n-ary Quutifiers in Natural Language[M]//Peter Gardenfors.Generalized Quantifiers.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, 1987.

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部