期刊文献+

奈达铂与顺铂治疗非小细胞肺癌恶性胸腔积液的疗效分析 被引量:11

Curative effect of nedaplain and cisplatin in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion caused by nonsmall-cell lung cancer
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较使用奈达铂(NDP)与顺铂(DDP)胸腔灌注治疗非小细胞肺癌(Nonsmall-cell lung cancer,NSCLC)恶性胸腔积液的临床疗效、患者生活质量及不良反应。方法 79例NSCLC患者随机分为2组,其中治疗组39例,对照组40例。治疗组给予奈达铂40 mg/m2+地塞米松10 mg溶于40 mL生理盐水中,胸腔注入给药;对照组给予顺铂40 mg/m^2+地塞米松10 mg溶于40 mL生理盐水中,胸腔注入给药。两组患者均给予相同的常规对症治疗,观察两组临床疗效、生活质量改善情况及不良反应。结果治疗组有效率为89.7%,对照组有效率为62.5%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组消化道不良反应发生率为20.5%,对照组消化道不良反应发生率为60.0%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组的Karnofsky评分为(84.21±11.92)分,高于对照组的(71.86±10.88)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组的生存期为(16.83±3.68)个月,对照组的生存期为(13.11±2.07)个月,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与顺铂相比,奈达铂胸腔灌注治疗NSCLC引起的恶性胸腔积液是一种更有效且不良反应较轻的方法。 Objective To compare the clinical effect,improvement of patient' s quality of life and adverse reaction of nedaplain and cisplatin in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion caused by nonsmall-cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods Seventy nine NSCLC patients were divided into treatment group(n =39) and control group(n =40).Patients in treatment group were given cisplatin(40 mg/m^2) +dexamethasone(10 mg) dissolved in 40 mL saline.Patients in control group were given nedaplain(40 mg/m^2) +dexamethasone(10 mg) dissolved in 40 mL saline.The drugs were delivered by chest injection.Patients of the two groups were given the same conventional symptomatic treatment.The clinical effect,patient' s quality of life and adverse reaction were observed.Results The effective rate of treatment group was higher than that of control group,there was significant difference between the two groups(89.7%vs.62.5%,P〈0.05).The incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions was lower than that of control group,there was significant difference between the two groups(20.5%vs.60.0%,P〈0.05).The Karnofsky scores of treatment group and control group were 84.21 ±11.92 and 71.86 ± 10.88,there was significant difference between the two groups(P〈0.05).The survival time of treatment group and control group were 16.83 ±3.68 and 13.11±2.07,there was significant difference between the two groups(P〈0.05).Conclusion Nedaplain pleural perfusion treatment for malignant pleural effusion induced by NSCLC is a more effective method than cisplatin with lighter degree of adverse reaction.
出处 《实用药物与临床》 CAS 2016年第1期48-51,共4页 Practical Pharmacy and Clinical Remedies
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(81201803)
关键词 奈达铂 顺铂 非小细胞肺癌 胸腔积液 Nedaplain Cisplatin Nonsmall-cell lung cancer Pleural effusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献132

共引文献62

同被引文献101

引证文献11

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部