期刊文献+

中国伞兵着陆于不同地面情况时足底动力学指标的变化

Changes of plantar dynamics in Chinese paratroopers landing on different ground conditions
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察伞兵着陆于不同地面情况时足底动力学指标值的变化规律。方法利用德国Pedar-X足底压力检测系统检测20名现役八一跳伞大队的跳伞运动员,模拟伞兵从60cm高度跳台跳下分别着陆于硬质地面和软质地面,记录相应的足底最大应力、最大压力、最大压力时间积分值的动力学指标值。将左、右足底分为10区,观察足底在两种地面情况下各自的变化规律,比较两种地面情况下足底最大应力的差异。结果左、右足底最大应力值在硬质地面和软质地面情况下分布均为9—10区〉8区〉1~7区;两种地面情况下足底最大应力值比较,后足的应力值差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);左、右足底最大压力值的分布规律与最大应力值的分布规律一致,两种地面情况下足底最大压力值比较右后足的应力值差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);左足前足压力时间积分值在硬地与沙地上差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),右足前足压力时间积分值在硬地与沙地上差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论半蹲式着陆于硬地的后足最大压力值、最大应力值明显高于前足,与着陆于软地时足底最大压力值、最大应力值比较有差异。半蹲式着陆于硬质地面时足跟部易于出现损伤。在半蹲式着陆于软地较着陆于硬地不容易受到损伤。 Objective To investigate the variation of plantar dynamics in paratroopers landing on different ground conditions. Methods German Pedar-X system was used to measure the dynamic indexes of 20 active-duty parachutists from "August 1st" Skydiving Team, who simulated the jump from 60 cm-high platform as the paratroopers, and landed on the hard and soft ground, respectively, and the maximum stress, maximum pressure, and maximum pressure- time integral were recorded. The left and right plantar were divided into 10 regions. The variation of the plantar on the ground of two different conditions was determined. The differences of the plantar maximum stress of the two ground conditions were compared. Results The maximum stress distribution of left and right plantar on the hard and soft ground was : regions 9-10〉 region 8〉 regions 1-7, respectively. Compared with the maximum hind-plantar stress, there were statistically significant differences between the maximum plantar stresses of the two ground conditions (P〈0.05). The distribution of the maximum pressure and maximum stress of the left and right plantar was consistent. Compared with the maximum right hind-plantar stress, there were statistically significant differences between the maximum plantar stresses of the two ground conditions (P〈0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the time integral of left and right fore-plantar on hard and sandy ground, respectively (P〈0.05). Conclusion The maximum pressure and maximum stress of hind-plantar of half squat-style landing on hard ground were significantly higher than those of fore-plantar of half squat-style landing on soft ground. There are differences in the maximum pressure and maximum stress between half squat-style landing on hard and soft ground. Compared with hard ground, landing with half squat-style on soft ground is not easy to injure heels.
出处 《中华生物医学工程杂志》 CAS 2015年第5期422-427,共6页 Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering
基金 国家自然基金(81071516)
关键词 中国伞兵 足底 Pedar-X系统 动力学指标 Chinese paratroopers plantar Pedar-X system dynamic indext
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1冯文树,刘铁汉,何杨举,简进章,范建伟.采用两种跳伞着陆姿势着陆时人体主要节段承受的冲击过载[J].航天医学与医学工程,1989,2(2):84-88. 被引量:5
  • 2Sneyers C J, Lysens R, Feys H, et al. Influence of malaligment of feet on the plantar pressure pattern in running [J]. Foot Ankle lnt, 1995,16(10) : 624-632.
  • 3Carcia CR, Kivlan BR, Scibek JS. Time to peak force is related to frontal plane landing kinematics in female athletes [J]. Phys Ther Sport,2012,13(2) :73-79.
  • 4Yeow CH, Lee PV, Goh JC. Regression relationships of landing height with ground reaction forces, knee flexion angles, angular velocities and joint powers during double-leg landing[J]. Knee, 2009,16(5) :381-386.
  • 5Arampatzis A1, Morey-Klapsing G, Brtlggemann GP. The effect of failing height on muscle activity and foot motion during Landings[J]. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2003,13(6) :533-544.
  • 6Birtane M, Tuna H. The evaluation of plantar pressure distribution in obese and non-obese adults [J]. Clin Biomech, 2004,19(10) : 1055-1059.
  • 7Pirson J, Pirlot M. A study of the influence of body weight and height on military parachute landing injuries[J]. Mil Med, 1990, 155 ( 8 ) : 383 -385.
  • 8Chen HY, Peter VSL, James CHG. An investigation of lower extremity energy dissipation strategies during single- leg and double- leg landing based on sagittal and frontal plane biomechanies [J ]. Human Movement Science, 2011,30 (3) : 624- 635.
  • 9Zhang SN, Bates BT, Duiek JS. Contributions of tower extremity joints to energy dissipation during landings [J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2000,32(4) : 812-816.
  • 10Fong DT, Chan YY, Hong Y, et al. A three- pressure- sensor (3PS) system for monitoring ankle supination torque during sport motions. J Biomech, 2008,41 ( 11 ) : 2562-2566.

二级参考文献3

共引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部