期刊文献+

瑞舒伐他汀和阿托伐他汀对不稳定型心绞痛患者PCI围术期心肌损伤及炎症因子水平的影响比较 被引量:19

Effect comparison between rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on the myocardial damage and levels of inflammatory factors in patients with unstable angina pectoris in perioperative period of percutaneous coronary intervention
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比瑞舒伐他汀与阿托伐他汀对不稳定型心绞痛(UAP)患者经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)围术期心肌损伤及炎症因子水平的影响。方法拟行PCI治疗的UAP患者90例,随机分为瑞舒伐他汀组及阿托伐他汀组,各45例。2组在常规治疗基础上,分别给予瑞舒伐他汀钙片与阿托伐他汀钙片,比较2组术前、术后24 h的心肌损伤情况及炎症反应情况。结果术后24 h,2组血清肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)及心肌肌钙蛋白I(c Tn I)均显著升高(P<0.05或P<0.01),心型脂肪酸结合蛋白(h-FABP)水平无显著变化(P>0.05);瑞舒伐他汀组CK-MB、c Tn I水平及其高于正常值的发生率均显著低于阿托伐他汀组(P<0.05或P<0.01);2组超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)及γ-干扰素(IFN-γ)水平显著升高,阿托伐他汀组各指标均显著高于瑞舒伐他汀组(P<0.01)。结论与阿托伐他汀比较,瑞舒伐他汀对UAP患者围术期的心肌保护作用更好,可有效减轻炎症反应,降低心肌损伤指标水平。 Objective To compare the effect of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on the myocardial damage and levels of inflammatory factors in patients with unstable angina pectoris( UAP) in perioperative period of percutaneous coronary intervention( PCI). Methods Ninety patients with UAP who underwent PCI were randomly divided into rosuvastatin group( n = 45) and atorvastatin group( n = 45). Based on the routine treatment,both groups were respectively given rosuvastatin calcium tablets and atorvastatin calcium tablets. The conditions of myocardial damage and inflammatory reaction in both groups were compared preoperatively and 24 hours after operation. Results Twentyfour hours after operation,the levels of serum creatine kinase isoenzyme( CK-MB) and cardiac troponin I( c Tn I) in two groups increased significantly( P〈0. 05 or P〈0. 01),but the level of heart type fatty acid binding protein( h-FABP) had no obvious change( P〈0. 05). The levels of CK-MB and c Tn I as well as their incidence rates of higher than the normal value in rosuvastatin group were significantly lower than those in atorvastatin group( P〈0. 05 or P〈0. 01). Twenty-four hours after operation,the levels of high sensitive C-reactive protein( hs-CRP),tumor necrosis factor-α( TNF-α) and interferon γ( IFN-γ) in two groups elevated significantly,but the level of each indicator in atorvastatin group was significantly higher than that in rosuvastatin group( P〈0. 01). Conclusion Rosuvastatin is superior to atorvastatin in myocardial protection of patients with UAP in perioperative period,and it can effectively relieve inflammation reaction and decrease the levels of myocardial damage indicators.
作者 梁涛 蒋军松
出处 《实用临床医药杂志》 CAS 2016年第3期18-20,24,共4页 Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
基金 中国高校医学期刊临床专项资金(11524389)
关键词 不稳定型心绞痛 瑞舒伐他汀 阿托伐他汀 心肌损伤 炎症因子 unstable angina pectoris rosuvastatin atorvastatin myocardial damage inflammatory factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Hwang J,Lee H C,Kim B W,et al.The effect on periprocedural myocardial infarction of intra-coronary nicorandil prior to percutaneous coronary intervention in stable and unstable angina[J].J Cardiol,2013,62(2):77.
  • 2陈磊,刘先霞,张远生.冠心病患者PCI手术围术期发生心肌损伤的相关因素分析[J].海南医学,2015,26(15):2218-2220. 被引量:26
  • 3Tardif J C,Tanguay J F,Wright S S,et al.Effects of the Pselectin antagonist inclacumab on myocardial damage after percutaneous coronary intervention for non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction:results of the SELECT-ACS trial[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2013,61(20):2048.
  • 4刘阳春,李浪.瑞舒伐他汀在心血管疾病中的应用进展[J].中国循环杂志,2014,29(8):658-660. 被引量:27
  • 5柯元南,陈纪林.不稳定性心绞痛和非ST段抬高心肌梗死诊断与治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(4):295-304. 被引量:2165
  • 6Mohr F W,Morice M C,Kappetein A P,et al.Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease:5-year follow-up of the randomised,clinical SYNTAX trial[J].Lancet,2013,381(9867):629.
  • 7Dewilde W J M,Oirbans T,Verheugt F W A,et al.Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention:an open-label,randomised,controlled trial[J].Lancet,2013,381(9872):1107.
  • 8Babu G G,Walker J M,Yellon D M,et al.Peri-procedural myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary intervention:an important target for cardioprotection[J].Eur Heart J,2011,32(1):23.
  • 9Patti G,Pasceri V,D'Antonio L,et al.Comparison of safety and efficacy of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention(from the anti-thrombotic strategy for reduction of myocardial damage during angioplasty–bivalirudin vs heparin study)[J].Am J Cardiol,2012,110(4):478.
  • 10Thygesen K,Alpert J S,Jaffe A S,et al.Third universal definition of myocardial infarction[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2012,60(16):1581.

二级参考文献94

共引文献2333

同被引文献175

引证文献19

二级引证文献126

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部