期刊文献+

腐植酸、EDTA、Cr(Ⅵ)调控猪粪尿废水异化Fe(Ⅲ)还原偶联VFAs的转化能力比较 被引量:1

A comparative study on ability of humic acids, EDTA and Cr(Ⅵ)to regulate dissimilatory Fe(Ⅲ)-mediated transformation of VFAs in swine wastewater
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以人工合成Fe(OH)3作为电子受体,在猪粪尿废水中添加具有铁还原能力的菌株,厌氧恒温培养,通过对猪粪尿废水中添加不同浓度腐植酸、EDTA、Cr(Ⅵ),揭示3种典型理化因素调控猪粪尿废水中异化Fe(Ⅲ)还原偶联挥发性脂肪酸(Volatile fatty acids,VFAs)转化能力。结果表明,电子穿梭体腐植酸促进Fe(Ⅲ)还原,加速VFAs降解,而络合剂EDTA和重金属Cr(Ⅵ)则会阻碍Fe(Ⅲ)还原,减缓VFAs降解。虽然三种影响因子影响机理不同、途径不同,但最终Fe(Ⅲ)还原和VFAs平衡点不变。 Research has showed that environmental factors influence dissimilatory Fe(Ⅲ)-mediated transformation of VFAs in water. Here we examined the effects of humic acids, EDTA and Cr(Ⅵ)at different concentrations on the ability of dissimilatory Fe(Ⅲ)to regulate the degradation of VFAs in swine wastewater at constant temperatures. The reduction of Fe(Ⅲ)oxides was promoted by addition of humic acid to swine wastewater, and the rate of VFAs degradation was accelerated by increasing amount of humic acid. However, trisodium EDTA and Cr(Ⅵ)inhibited the reduction of Fe(Ⅲ) and slowed down the degradation of VFAs. Although these three factors had different mecha-nisms and processes influencing Fe(Ⅲ)reduction, the final reduction of Fe(Ⅲ)and the balance points of VFAs remained same.
出处 《农业环境科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期590-595,共6页 Journal of Agro-Environment Science
基金 泰州市科技支撑计划(社会发展)项目(SSF20150075) 江苏省高校自然科学研究面上项目(15KJD610005) 江苏省高等学校大学生创新创业训练计划项目(201512917009Y)
关键词 异化Fe(Ⅲ)还原 EDTA 腐植酸 Cr(Ⅵ) VFAs dissimilatory Fe(Ⅲ)reduction EDTA humic acids Cr(Ⅵ) VFAs
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1Zhu J. A review of microbiology in swine manure odor control[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2000, 78:93-106.
  • 2Mackie R I, Stroot P G, Varel V H. Biochemical identification and biological origin of key odor components in livestock waste [J]. Journal of Animal Science, 1998, 76: 1331-1342.
  • 3McCrory D F, Hobbs P J. Additives to reduce ammonia and odor emissions from livestock waste:a review[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2001, 30:345-355.
  • 4Nahm K H. Environmental effects of chemical additives used in poultry litter and swine manure[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2005, 35:487-513.
  • 5Otto E R, Yokoyama M, Hengemuehle S, et al. Ammonia, volatile fatty acids, phenolics, and odor offensiveness in manure from growing pigs fed diets reduced in protein concentration[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2003, 81 : 1754-1763.
  • 6Gostelow P, Parsons S A, Stuetz R M. Odour measurement for sewage treatment works[J]. Water Resources, 2001, 35 : 579-597.
  • 7Lunn F, Van De Vyver J. Sampling and analysis of air in pig house[J]. Agriculture and Environment, 1977, 3 : 159-169.
  • 8Spoelstra S F. Origin of objectionable odorous components in piggery wastes and the possibility of applying indicator components for studying odour development[J]. Agriculture and Environment, 1980, 5 : 241 - 260.
  • 9Williams A G. Indicator of piggery slurry odour offensiveness[J]. A griculture Waste, 1984, 10:15-36.
  • 10Zahn J A, DiSpirito A A, Do Y S, et al. Correlation of human olfactory responses to airborne concentrations of malodorous volatile organic compounds emitted from swine effluent[J]. Journol of Environmentol Quality, 2001, 30: 624-633.

共引文献4

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部