认知-情感要素对员工即兴行为影响机制的研究:一个跨层分析被引量：13

How Cognitive-Emotional Factors Influence Team Members' Improvisation:The Main and Moderation Effects

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要即兴是一种自发的、意图创造的行为方式,用以应对目前复杂的商业环境。本研究探讨了团队及个体层面的认知与情感要素可能对员工即兴行为产生的影响,以及团队要素对个体层面直接关系的跨层调节作用,分析了员工即兴行为产生的内在机制。通过对57个团队的213名员工及其直接上级的问卷调查得出结论:(1)个体的情绪智力与认知灵活性对其即兴行为的发生有积极的影响;(2)团队情绪氛围与知识共享水平对个体即兴行为有积极的影响;(3)团队情绪氛围仅对情绪智力与个体即兴行为之间的关系起到正向调节作用,知识共享仅对认知灵活性与个体即兴行为之间的关系起到正向调节作用。研究方法与研究结论为管理实践和管理理论发展奠定了基础。 Improvisation is a spontaneous, intention to creative behavior which to deal with the complex business environ- ment. In this study, we examine the main effects of cognitive and emotional factors belonging to team-level and individual-level separately and moderating roles of team-level factors on relationships of individual-level factors and sub- ordinate＇ s improvisation. We test hypotheses using an empirical study of 213 subordinates nested under 57 supervisors. Cognitive flexibility and emotional intelligence are found to positively influence improvisation; Team knowledge sharing is found to positively influence improvisation and moderates the relationship of cognitive flexibility and improvisation; team emotional climate is found to positively influence improvisation and moderates the relationship of emotional intelligence and improvisation. Findings, future implications and limitations are discussed.

作者门一樊耘马贵梅

机构地区西安交通大学管理学院过程控制与效率工程教育部重点实验室

出处《预测》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期17-22,共6页 Forecasting

基金教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20130201110020)

关键词认知灵活性情绪智力团队知识共享团队情绪氛围即兴行为 cognitive flexibility emotional intelligence team knowledge sharing team emotional climate improvisation

分类号 F272.90 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献29

1Vera D, Crossan M. Improvisation and innovative performance in teams [ J ]. Organization Science, 2005, 16 ( 3 ) : 203-224.
2Leone L. A critical review of improvisation in organiza- tions: open issues" and future research directions [ A]. The DRUID Summer Conierence 2010 on Opening Up Innovation : Strategy, Organization and Technology [ C ]. Imperial College London Business SchooL, London, 2010. 1-36.
3Kamoche K, Cunha J V. Towards a theory of organiza- tional improvisation: looking beyond the jazz metaphor [ J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40 (8) : 2023 -205.
4L. Monrman C, Miner A S. Organizational improvisation and organizational memory [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(4) : 698 -723.
5Hadida A L, Tarvainen W. Organizational improvisation: a consolidating review and framework [ J ]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2014, doi: 10. 1111/ ijmr. 12047.
6Mirvis P H. Variations on a theme--practice improvisa- tion[J]. Organization Science, 1998, 9(5): 586-592.
7Ieybournc S, SadLer-Smith E. The role of intuition and improvisatiou in project raanagement [ J ]. International Journal of Project Management, 2006, 24(6): 483-492.
8Montuori A. The complexity of improvisation and the improvisation of complexity: social science, art and crea- tivity[ J]. Human Relations, 2003, 56(2): 237-255.
9Misehel W, Shoda Y. A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: re-conceptualizing situations, disposi- tions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure [J]. IsychologicaL Review, /995, 102(2): 246-268.
10Zhou J, George J M. Awakening employee creativity: the role of leader emotional intelligence[ J]. The Lead- ership Quarterly, 2003, 14(4): 545-568.