4Rumberger JA, Simons DB, Fitzpatrick LA, et al. Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study. Circulation, 1995,92:2157-2162.
5Becker CR, Kleffel T, Crispin A, et al. Coronary artery calcium measurement: agreement of multirow detector and eldetron beam CT. Am J Roentgenol, 2001 : 176 : 1295-1298.
6Carr J J, Crouse JR, Goff DC. Evaluation of subsecond gated helical CT for Qualitifiction of coronary artery calcium and comparison with electron beam CT. Am J Roentgenol, 2000174:915-921.
7WS. ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical ExpertConsensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography). J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007,49 : 378-402.
8Leber AW, Knez A, Von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005, 46: 147- 154,
9Leshka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology : first experience. Eur Heart J 2005,26:1482-1487.
10Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Van Mieghem C, et al. High- resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation, 2005, 112 : 2318-2323.
