期刊文献+

血管抑制蛋白VASH1在NSCLC中的表达及意义 被引量:3

Expression and clinical significance of VASH1 in NSCLC
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨血管生成抑制蛋白1(vashohibin-1,VASH1)、微血管密度(microvessel density,MVD)在非小细胞肺癌(non-small-cell lung cancer,NSCLC)组织中的表达及VASH1与临床病理特征及MVD的关系。方法采用免疫组织化学方法检测72例NSCLC组织、30例癌旁组织、21例肺良性病变组织蜡块中VASH1表达与MVD水平,同时分析VASH1与NSCLC患者临床病理特征的关系,并探讨其与MVD二者之间的相关性。结果 NSCLC、癌旁组织和肺良性病变组织中VASH1蛋白阳性表达率分别为73.6%(53/72)、26.7%(8/30)、14.3%(3/21),三者间比较差异有统计学意义(χ^2=33.15,P〈0.01)。VASH1的表达在NSCLC的淋巴结转移、TNM分期和分化程度方面差异有统计学意义(均P〈0.05),且NSCLC组织中VASH1表达与MVD水平亦呈正相关(r=0.434,P〈0.01)。结论 VASH1在NSCLC组织中表达升高,与NSCLC淋巴结转移、TNM分期、组织分化紧密相关,其在NSCLC的发生、发展过程中起重要作用。 Objective To investigate the expression of vashohibin-1( VASHl) in non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC) and its relation to microvessel density(MVD) and clinicopathologic features. Methods Immunohistochemistry assay was used to detect the expression level of VASHl and MVD in 72 samples of NSCLC tissues,30 samples of pericancerous lung tissue and 21 lung tissue samples of benign disease. Results The positive rates of VASH1 expression were73. 6%(53/72),26. 7%(8/30) and 14. 3%(3/21) in NSCLC tissue,pericancerous tissue,and tissue of benign lung diseases,respectively( χ^2= 33. 15,P〈 0. 01). The expression of VASHl was significantly different in patients with different status of lymph node metastasis,TNM stage and differentiation grade in NSCLC tissue( P〈0. 05). VASH1 expression and MVD level in NSCLC tissue were positively correlated( r = 0. 434,P 〈0. 01). Conclusion The expression of VASHl is up-regulated in NSCLC,and closely associated with lymph node metastasis,TNM stage,differentiation grade and microvessel density of NSCLC.
出处 《实用肿瘤杂志》 CAS 2016年第2期140-144,共5页 Journal of Practical Oncology
关键词 非小细胞肺/病理学 非小细胞肺/血液供给 血管抑制蛋白质类/代谢 毛细血管 免疫组织化学 carcinoma non-small-cell lung/pathology carcinoma non-small-cell lung/blood supply angiostatic proteins/metabolism capillaries immunohistochemistry
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statis-tics ,2012. CA Cancer[J]. Clin,2015,65(2) :87 -108.
  • 2Jain RK. Molecular regulation of vessel maturation [ J ].Nat Med,2003,9(6) :685 -693.
  • 3Watanabe K,Hasegawa Y,Yamashita H. Vasohibin as anendothelium-derived negative feedback regulator of angio-genesis. [ J] . Clin Invest,2004,114(7) :898 -907.
  • 4Shimizu K,Watanabe K,Yamashita H,et al. Gene regula-tion of a novel angiogenesis inhibitor,vasohibin,in endo-thelial cells [ J] . Biochem Biophys Res Commun,2005,327(3) :700-706.
  • 5Miyake K,Nishida K,Kadota Y,et al. Inflammatory cyto-kine-induced expression of vasohibin-1 by rheumatoidsynovial fibroblasts [ J ]. Acta Med Okayama,2009,63(6);349 -358.
  • 6Watatani H, Maeshima Y, Hinamoto N, et al. Vasohibin-1 deficiency enhances renal fibrosis and inflammation after unilateral ureteral obstruction [ J ]. Physiol Rep, 2014,2 (6) :e12054.
  • 7Wakusawa R, Abe T,Sato H,et al. Suppression of choroi-dal neovascularization by vasohibin-1,a vascular endothe-lium-derived angiogenic inhibitor [ J ]. Invest OphthalmolVis Sci,2011,52(6) :3272 -3280.
  • 8Hosaka T,Kimura H,Heishi T,et al. Vasohibin-1 expres-sion in endothelium of tumor blood vessels regulates an-giogenesis [J]. Am J Pathol,2009,175 (1) :430 -439?.
  • 9Murakami K,Kasajima A,Kawagishi Net al. The prognos-tic significance of vasohibin 1 -associated angiogenesis inpatients with hepatocellular carcinoma [ J ]. Hum Patho,2014,45(3) ;589 -597.
  • 10Kosaka T,Miyazaki Y,Miyajima A,et al. The prognosticsignificance of vasohibin-1 expression in patients withprostate cancer[ J]. Br J Cancer,2013,108 ( 10) : 2123-2129.

二级参考文献29

  • 1Kris MG, Johnson BE, Kwiatkowski D J, et al. Identification of driver mutations in tumor specimens from 1 000 patients with lung adenocarcinoma:The NCI's Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium(LCMC) [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011,29( 18 Suppl) :CRA7506.
  • 2Pirker R, Pereira JR, von Pawel J, et al. EGFR expression as a predictor of survival for first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of data from the phase 3 FLEX study [ J ]. Lancet Oncol,2012,13 ( 1 ) : 33 - 42.
  • 3Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, et al. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer( OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802 ) : A Multicentre, Open- Label,Randomised, Phase 3 Study [ J ]. Lancet Oncol, 2011,12(8) :735 -742.
  • 4Rosell R, Gervais R, Vergnenegre A, et al. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy (CT) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) patients (p) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations : Interim results of the European Erlotinib Versus Chemotherapy (EURTAC) Phase Ⅲ Randomized Trial [J]. J Clin Oncol,2011,29( 15 Suppl) :7503.
  • 5Zhang L, Shenglin M, Song X, et al. Efficacy, tolerability, and biomarker analyses from a phase Ⅲ randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study of gefitinib as maintenance" therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-stnall cell lung cancer( NSCLC ; INFORM ; C-TONG 0804) [J]. J Clin Oncol,2011,29( 18 Suppl) : LBA7511.
  • 6Gaafar RM, Surmont VF, Scagliotti GV, et al. A double- blind, randomized,placebo-controlled phase Ⅲ intergroup study of gefitinib in patients with advanced NSCLC on- progressing after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy ( EORTC08021/ILCPO1/03 ) [ J ]. Eur J Cancer, 2011, 47(15) :2331 -2340.
  • 7Ciuleanu T, Stelmakh L, Cicenas S, et al. Efficacy and safety of erlotinib versus chemotherapy in second-line treatment of patients with advanced, non-small cell lung cancer with poor prognosis ( TITAN ) : A randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study [ J ]. Lancet Oncol, 2012,13 (3) : 300 - 308.
  • 8Ahn M J, Sun JM, Lee KH, et al. Randomized phase Ⅲ trial of gefitinib or pemetrexed as second-line treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy ( KCSG-LU08-01 ) [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011,29( 15 Suppl) :7603.
  • 9Sun Y, Shi Y, Zhang L, et al. A randomized, double-blind phase Ⅲ study of Icotinib versus Gefitinih in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy(ICOGEN) [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2011,29( 15 Suppl) :7522.
  • 10Miller VA, Hirsh V, Cadranel J, et al. Phase IIB/Ⅲ double-blind randomized trial of afatinib( BIBW 2992, an irreversible inhibitor of EGFR/HER1 and HER2) best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo BSC in patients with NSCLC failing 1 2 lines of chemotherapy and erlotinib or gefitinib ( LUX-LUNG 1 ) [ J ]. Ann Oncol, 2010,21 (8) :LBA1.

共引文献3

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部