期刊文献+

鼻咽癌同步推量调强放疗与传统调强放疗的近远期疗效比较应 被引量:18

Clinical study of simultaneous integrated boost versus conventional intensity modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的目前,调强放射治疗技术已被广泛应用于鼻咽癌的治疗中,本研究旨在探讨同步推量调强放射治疗与传统调强放疗治疗在鼻咽癌患者的近期和远期治疗效果。方法选取2008—04—12—2010—07—01山东省肿瘤医院收住的鼻咽癌患者102例,根据放疗方式不同分为研究组(50例)和对照组(52例)。研究组采用同步推量调强放疗,对照组采用传统调强放疗,比较两组的近期有效率、毒副作用和远期疗效。结果两组总有效率分别为90.0%(45/50)和86.5%(45/52);其近期疗效差异无统计学意义,x2=0.022,P=0.882;研究组和对照组3~4级口腔黏膜急性毒副作用分别为54.0%和55.8%(P=0.858),面颈部皮肤反应分别为4.0%和11.5%(P=0.245);两组5年无进展生存率、总生存率分别为76.0%和69.2%(x2=1.14,P=0.286)和84.0%、82.7%(x2=0.031,P=0.859)。结论与传统调强放疗相比,同步推量调强放疗在鼻咽癌近期和远期疗效及副作用方面的效果相似,两者差异无统计学意义。 OBJECTIVE Urrently the intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique has been widely applied to the treatment of nasopharyngeal earcinoma(NPC), the study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects comparing simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-IMRT) versus conventional intensity modulated radiotherapy (C-IMRT) in patients with NPC. METHODS 102 newly diagnosed local/regional advanced NPC patients were randomized to be treated by SIB-IMRT (n=50) and C-IMRT (n=52) between April 12,2008 and July 1, 2010 in Shandong tumor hospital. The acute radiation toxicities were evaluated by toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). Five-year local control rates, distant metastasis-free survivals and overall survivals were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The overall reponse rate was 90.0%(45/50) and 86.5%(45/52) in two groups, respectively, and the difference of short-term effects was no statistically significant, x2= 0. 022, P = 0. 882. With median follow-up time of 69 months, there was no significant difference in toxicities between the two IMRT techniques. The grade 3-4 acute mucositis and skin reaction of face and neck were 54.0% and 55.8% (P=0. 858), 4.0% and 11.5% (P=0. 245). The five-year dis- tant metastasis-free survivals (DMFS) and the overall survivals (OS) were 76.0% and 84.0% in SIB-IMRT and 69.2% and 82.7% in C-IMRT, respectively (P=0. 286 for DMFS and 0. 859 for OS). CONCLUSION The treatment comparing SIB-IMRT versus C-IMRT was similar and showed no statistically significant differences in terms of the short and long-term effects and the acute adverse events.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2016年第4期244-247,共4页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 鼻咽癌 同步推量调强放疗 传统调强放疗 疗效 nasopharyngeal carcinoma simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy conventional intensity modulated radiotherapy efficac
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Qiu S, Lin S, Tham IWK, et al. Intensity-modulated radiationtherapy inthe salvage of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carci- noma[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2012,83(2).. 676-683.
  • 2Nutting C, Dearnaley DP, Webb S. Intensity modulated radia- tion therapy: a clinical review[J]. Br J Radiol,2000,73(869): 459-469.
  • 3Wang W, Feng M, Fan Z, et al. Clinical outcomes and prognos- tic factors of 695 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2014, 2014: 814948.
  • 4Qiu S, Lin S, Tham IWK, et al. Intensity-modulated radiationtherapy inthe salvage o{ locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carci- noma[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2012,83(2).. 676-683.
  • 5Zhang MX, Li J, Shen GP. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy prolongs the survival of patients withnasopharyngeal carcinoma compared with conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy: A 10-year experience with a large cohort and long follow-up[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2015,51(17) :2587-2597.
  • 6A1-Mamgani A, Levendag PC, van Rooij P, et al. Intensity- modulated radiotherapy followed by a brachytherapy boost for oropharyngeal cancer[J]. Head Neck, 2013,35(12) .. 1689-1697.
  • 7Fareed MM, Alamro AS, Bayoumi Y, et al. Intensity modula ted radiotherapy with simultaneous modulated accelerated boost technique and chemotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal car- cinoma[J]. BMC Cancer, 2013,13.-318.
  • 8孙久波,郝俊芳,杨新华,于水,董伟,李一明,王兴莉.鼻咽癌常规放疗与调强放疗的临床研究[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2012,19(19):1495-1498. 被引量:26
  • 9Lee N, Harris J, Garden AS, et al. Intensity-modulated radia- tion therapy with or without chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: radiation therapy oneology group phase I] trial 0225 [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009,27(22) :3684-3690.
  • 10Peng G, Wang T, Yang KY, et al. A prospective, randomized study comparing outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Radiother On- col, 2012,104(3) :286-293.

二级参考文献11

共引文献74

同被引文献178

引证文献18

二级引证文献104

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部