摘要
《刑事诉讼法》对于"特别重大"的模糊规定使得侦查机关在特别重大贿赂案件中面对律师的会见权的行使举棋不定,而侦查中心主义与口供依赖也使得会见权在特别重大贿赂案件中的实现颇为困难。本文立足于对会见权在特别重大贿赂案件中的理论价值的重新认识,着眼于从制度构建的角度推动检察机关与辩护律师平等对话,并希望凭借以审判为中心诉讼制度改革的东风,通过对会见权在特别重大贿赂案件中的合理界定限制检察机关的权力、引入会见权救济渠道强化律师的权利、加强法律职业共同体交流等措施来实现会见权的再出发。
The vagueness of ＂particularly serious＂ from the Criminal Procedure Law makes the investigative organization hesitate to perform the meeting right of facing the lawyers in the particularly serious bribery case.But the investigative centralism and the oral confession dependence make the realization of the meeting right in the particularly serious bribery case become rather more difficult.The paper,on the basis of re-understanding as well as the cause exploration of the theoretical value the meeting right in the particularly serious bribery case,focuses on making that the investigation organs and the defense lawyers have an equal dialogue from the height of the system construction.With the help of the litigation system reform that takes the trial as the central task,it realizes restart of the meeting right by defining the meeting right＇s reasonable limit in the particularly serious bribery case and making the preliminary hearing system lead into the meeting right＇s relief channel to strengthen the legal profession community communication these measures and so on.
出处
《行政与法》
2016年第4期81-88,共8页
Administration and Law
基金
安徽省人民检察院检察理论研究项目"检察环节保障律师依法执业研究课题"的阶段性成果
关键词
会见权
特别重大贿赂案件
侦查权
合理界限
meeting right
particularly serious bribery case
investigation power
reasonable limit
