期刊文献+

腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性坏疽穿孔性阑尾炎 被引量:128

Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Acute Gangrenous Perforated Appendicitis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜切除术治疗急性坏疽穿孔性阑尾炎的临床价值。方法 2011年6月~2014年9月对36例急性坏疽穿孔性阑尾炎施行腹腔镜下阑尾切除术,腹腔镜下探查腹腔,吸净脓液及渗液,提起阑尾显露系膜,用双极电凝钳切断阑尾系膜,编织线双重套扎阑尾根部,阑尾残端予以荷包包埋,放置腹腔引流。结果 36例均顺利完成手术,无中转开腹,无并发症发生。手术时间45~115 min,平均65 min。术后引流管留置2~4 d。术后5~7 d出院。33例随访3~6个月,无腹痛、腹胀等表现。结论腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性坏疽穿孔性阑尾炎安全、有效,可直视下腹腔冲洗,放置准确有效的引流管。 Objective To explore the clinical value of laparoscopic appendectomy for acute gangrenous perforated appendicitis. Methods A total of 36 patients with acute gangrenous perforated appendicitis underwent laparoscopic appendectomy from June 2011 to September 2014. After laparoscopic exploration and suction of purulent fluid and exudate,the appendix was lifted to expose and cut off mesenterium with bipolar electrocoagulation. The appendix root was double-ligated and the stump was purse string sutured. An abdominal drainage was placed. Results All the 36 cases were successfully operated. There was no conversion to laparotomy and complications. The operation continued for 45- 115 min,with a mean of 65 min. The postoperative drainage was indwelled for 2- 4 d. All the patients recovered and went home after 5- 7 d. Follow-ups for 3- 6 months in 33 patients found no abdominal pain or distention. Conclusion Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute gangrenous perforated appendicitis is safe and effective,with advantages of peritoneal washing under direct vision and accurately and effectively placing drainage tube.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第4期380-381,共2页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
关键词 腹腔镜阑尾切除术 急性坏疽穿孔性阑尾炎 腹腔引流术 Laparoscopic appendectomy Acute gangrenous perforated appendicitis Peritoneal drainage
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献35

  • 1中华医学会外科分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组.腹腔镜阑尾切除术常规[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2006,11(4):359-360. 被引量:117
  • 2Horsemann R,Tiwisina C, Classen C, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy:which factors influence the decision between the surgical technique ? [ J ]. Zentralbl Chir, 2005,130 ( 1 ) :48 -54.
  • 3Padankatti LR, Pramod RK, Gupta A, et al.' Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis : A prospective study [ J ]. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg,2008,13 (3) : 104-106.
  • 4Serum K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy, 1983,15 (2) :59 - 64.
  • 5吴在德,吴肇汉,主编.外科学.第7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012.467-472.
  • 6Wei HB, Huang JL, Zheng ZH, et al. Laparoseopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Surg Endose, 2009,24 ( 2 ) : 266 - 269.
  • 7Kazemier G, Hofint K, Saad S, et al. Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling. Surg Endosc ,2006,20 (9) : 1473 - 76.
  • 8Schick KS, Huttl TP, Fertmann JM, et al. A critical analysis of laparoscopic appendectomy : how experience with 1,400 appendectomies allowed innovative treatment to become standard in a university hospital. World J Surg,2008,32 ( 7 ) : 1406 - 1413.
  • 9Street D, Bodai BI, Owens LJ, et al. Simple ligation vs stump in version in appendectomy. Arch Surg, 1998,123 (4) :689 - 690.
  • 10C. Mouly,R. Chati,M. Scotté,J.-M. Regimbeau.Therapeutic management of perforated gastro-duodenal ulcer: literature review[J].Journal of Visceral Surgery.2013

共引文献118

同被引文献519

引证文献128

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部