期刊文献+

单磷酸阿糖腺苷联合丙种球蛋白治疗小儿重症手足口病的临床效果分析 被引量:8

Clinical Curative Effect of Vidarabine Monophosphate Combined with Gamma Globulin for the Treatment of Severe HandFoot-Mouth Disease in Children
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨单磷酸阿糖腺苷联合丙种球蛋白治疗小儿重症手足口病的临床效果。方法选取2013年3月至2015年3月间我院收治的小儿重症手足口病患者140例,随机均分为两组,对照组采取单磷酸阿糖腺苷治疗,观察组采用单磷酸阿糖腺苷联合丙种球蛋白治疗,比较两组患儿的治疗效果。结果观察组的体温恢复时间、神经系统恢复时间均显著短于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组的皮疹治疗总有效率为85.71%,显著高于对照组的65.71%(P<0.05);观察组的临床总有效率为91.43%,显著高于对照组的57.57%(P<0.05)。结论单磷酸阿糖腺苷联合丙种球蛋白治疗小儿重症手口足病的临床疗效显著,值得临床推广使用。 Objective To explore the clinical effect ofvidarabine monophosphate combined with gamma globulin for the treatment of children with severe hand-foot-mouth disease (HFMD). Methods A total of 140 cases of children with HFMD admitted to our hospital from March 2013 to March 2015 were selected and randomly divided into two groups equally. The observation group was treated with vidarabine monophosphate combined with gamma globulin, while the control group was treated with vidarabine monophosphate only. The clinical curative effects of two groups were observed and compared. Results The time for body temperature recovery and time for neurological recovery of observation group were significantly shorter than those of control group (P〈0.05). The total effective rate for rash of observation group was 85.71%, significantly higher than 65.71% of control group (P 〈0.05). The total effective rate of treatment of observation group was 91.43%, significantly higher than 57.57% of control group (P〈0.05). Conclusions The combined therapy ofvidarabine monophosphate and gamma globulin for the treatment of children with HFMD has significant clinical efficacy, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
出处 《临床医学工程》 2016年第5期645-646,共2页 Clinical Medicine & Engineering
关键词 单磷酸阿糖腺苷 丙种球蛋白 小儿重症口足症 临床疗效 Vidarabine monophosphate Gamma globulin Pediatric severe hand-foot-mouth disease Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献24

  • 1肖毅,刘文励,邓金牛,张东华,周剑锋.非化疗药物致粒细胞缺乏症的临床特点及治疗分析[J].内科急危重症杂志,2004,10(4):200-202. 被引量:2
  • 2陈同辛,王玺.原发性免疫缺陷病诊断标准[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2006,21(9):573-576. 被引量:38
  • 3Geha RS,Notarangelo LD,Casanova JL,et al. primary immunod eficiency disease:an update from the International Union of Im munological Societies Primary Immunodeficieney Diseases Classi fication Committee [J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2007,120 (4) 776.
  • 4Notarangelo LD, Fischer A, Geha RS, et al. Primary immunodefi- ciencies: 2009 update[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2009,124 (6) : 1161.
  • 5罗泽民,苏海涛.小儿手足口病50例临床分析[J]中国妇幼保健,2010,24(2;):256-237.
  • 6熊永芳.更昔洛韦治疗婴幼儿手足口病临床观察[J]长江大学学报(自科版)医学卷,2009,13(2):221-222.
  • 7Yang TC, Xu GZ, I)ing HI, et al. A case - control study of risk fac tots for severe hand foot month disease among children in Ningbo China, 2010 - 2011[J ]. Eur J Pediatr, 2012, 171 (9) : 1359 - 1364.
  • 8Solomon T, Lewthwaite P, Perera D, et al. Virology, epidemiology pathogenesis, and control of enterovirus 71 [J ]. Lancet Infect Dis 2010,10(11):778 790.
  • 9黄莹,李锐钦,邓皓辉,叶毅桦,黄全发,张若愚,尹雪玲,张素芬,叶国华,杨伟华.东莞市手足口病定点医院流行病学特点与疫情控制措施[J].赣南医学院学报,2008,28(4):634-634. 被引量:11
  • 10陈春,陈小平,伍思国.病毒唑联合大剂量丙种球蛋白冲击治疗手足口病临床观察[J].河北医学,2009,15(7):834-836. 被引量:5

共引文献32

同被引文献60

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部