期刊文献+

奥拉帕尼对CNE-2细胞不同剂量率照射的生物效应影响

Radiobiological effects of irradiation plus olaparib with different dose rates on CNE-2 cell line
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 研究人鼻咽癌细胞CNE-2在不同剂量率照射下给予PARP抑制剂奥拉帕尼后的生物效应变化。方法 采用奥拉帕尼IC10为实验用药浓度。分4个照射组(均0、1、2、3、5、7、10 Gy剂量):急速照射组(RT,各剂量点4 min内完成)、分次照射组(FRT,各剂量点30 min内完成)、奥拉帕尼+RT组、奥拉帕尼+FRT组。克隆分析法测得各剂量点存活分数,多靶单击模型拟合细胞存活曲线。蛋白印迹法检测0、1、2 Gy点RT、FRT组细胞PARP-1和各组细胞γH2AX的表达水平,免疫荧光验证各组细胞γH2AX焦点数。4个组间比较使用单因素方差分析,两两比较采用SNK-q检验。结果 奥拉帕尼对CNE-2细胞 IC10值为4.0μmol/L。1、2 Gy点FRT组细胞PARP-1表达均高于RT组(P=0.029、0.022),FRT组γH2AX蛋白和焦点均低于其余3个组(P均〈0.05)。FRT组较RT组D0、Dq、SF2值分别增加了11.67%、15.78%、23.61%,奥拉帕尼+FRT组较FRT组D0、Dq、SF2值分别降低了11.19%、6.44%、13.26%;RT组、奥拉帕尼+RT组、奥拉帕尼+FRT组间相近。结论同一剂量分次照射剂量率降低,生物效应下降;低剂量奥拉帕尼可在分次照射下降低剂量率下降引起的亚致死性修复,增加致死性损伤,进而提高了生物效应。 Objective To investigate the radiobiological effects of radiation with different dose rates on human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell line CNE-2 treated with or without a poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor,olaparib. Methods The concentration of olaparib used to treat cells equaled to the inhibition concentration IC10 of olaparib to CNE-2 cells. The CNE-2 cells were divided into acute radiotherapy (RT) group,fractionated radiotherapy (FRT) group,olaparib+RT group,and olaparib+FRT group. All groups were exposed to radiation of 0,1,2,3,5,7,and 10 Gy at a dose rate of 3 Gy/min.The delivery time for each dose point was 4 min in RT and 30 min in FRT.The colony forming assay was used to evaluate the survival of CNE-2 cells at each dose point. The multi-target,single-hit model was used to fit the cell survival curves and the parameters,D0,Dq,and SF2,were calculated. At dose points of 0,1,and 2 Gy,western blot was used to determine the expression of PARP-1 in the RT group and the FRT group and γH2AX in each group. Immunofluorescence was used to evaluate the γH2AX focus formation. A single factor analysis of variance was used to compare the 4 groups,and two two compared with SNK-q test. Results The IC10 value of olaparib to CNE-2 cells was4.0μmol/L.At dose points of 1 and 2 Gy,the PARP-1 expression was significantly higher in the FRT group than in the RT group (P=0.029,0.022),while the γH2AX focus number was significantly smaller in the FRT group than in the other three groups (all P〈0.05);compared with the RT group,the D0,Dq,and SF2 values in the FRT group were increased by 11.67%,15.78%,and 23.61%,respectively;compared with the FRT group,the D0,Dq,and SF2 values in the Olaparib+FRT group decreased by 11.19%,6.44%,and 13.26%,respectively;there were no significant differences in above indices between the RT group,the Olaparib+RT group,and the Olaparib+FRT group. Conclusions For the same radiation dose,fractionation reduces the relative dose rate and weakens the radiobiological effects.low-dose olaparib can compromise the single strand break repair induced by the decline of the relative dose rate in a fractionated irradiation mode,which promotes the formation of double-strand break and improves the radiobiological effects.
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第7期764-769,共6页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
基金 重庆市卫生局医学科研项目资助(2012-2-171)
关键词 奥拉帕尼 剂量率效应 放射损伤修复 细胞系 鼻咽癌 Olaparib Dose rate effect Repair of radiation damage Cell line,Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献218

  • 1张书旭,徐海荣,林生趣,李文华.鼻咽癌调强放疗和常规放疗受照剂量对比分析[J].第一军医大学学报,2004,24(8):937-939. 被引量:15
  • 2Benedict SH, Lin PS, Zwicker RD, et al. The biological effectiveness of intermittent irradiation as a function of overall treatment time: development of correction factors for linac-based stereotaetic radiotherapy [J]. Int J Radial Oncol Biol Phys, 1997, 37(4): 765-9.
  • 3Wang JZ, Li XA, D'Souza WD, et al. Impact of prolonged fraction delivery times on tumor control: a note of caution for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) [J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2003, 57(2): 543-52.
  • 4Fang FM, Chien CY, Tsai WL, et al. Quality of life and survival outcome for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy vs. intensity-modulated radiotherapy-a longitudinal study [J]. hat J Padiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2008, 72(2): 356-64.
  • 5Kampinga HH, Hiemstra YS, Konings AW, et al. Correlation between slowly repairable double-strand breaks and thermal radiosensitization in the human HeLa S3 cell line'[J]. Int J Radiat Biol, 1997, 72: 293-301.
  • 6杨伟志 冯宁远.近距离放射治疗的生物学[A]..肿瘤放射治疗学:第3版[C].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2002.321-322.
  • 7Wang JZ, Li XA, D Souza WD, et al. Impact of prolonged fraction delivery times on tumor control: a note of caution for intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2003,57:543-552.
  • 8Mu X,Lofroth PO,Karlsson M,et al. The effect of fraction time in intensity modulated radiotherapy: theoretical and experimental evaluation of an optimisation problem. Radiother Oncol, 2003, 68:181 - 187.
  • 9Wang M, Wu W, Wu W, et al. PARP-1 and Ku compete for repair of DNA double strand breaks by distinct NHEJ pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:6170-6182.
  • 10Daley JM, Palmbos PL, Wu D, Wilson TE. Nonhomologous end joining in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 2005; 39:431-451.

共引文献117

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部