期刊文献+

卫生技术评估中的伦理评估及其意义 被引量:5

Health Technology Assessment: Ethical Aspect and Its Implication
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过对国内外相关文献的梳理,在阐述卫生技术评估中伦理评估的概念与理论基础之上,指明伦理评估成为卫生技术评估的内在要素的理论必然性;重点介绍卫生技术评估中伦理评估的主要内容和评估方法,并结合具体案例评析不同方法的适用范围及其利弊;最后提出加强卫生技术的伦理评估对当前我国卫生决策和临床医疗实践具有重大的现实意义。 By literature review,the author discussed the definition and theoretical foundations of ethical assessment of Health Technology Assessment( HTA) in order to clarify the intrinsic value of ethical assessment as an inherent element of HTA. Furthermore,the contents and methodology of ethical assessment of HTA were summarized as well as the spectrum and merits of different approaches to integrate ethics in HTA were addressed through case-based analysis. Last but not least,the author argued strengthening the ethical assessment of health technologies was of great practical significance to optimize health technology decision making and promote good clinical practice in China.
作者 杨阳
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第8期68-72,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 2015年度美国国立卫生研究院Fogarty基金项目"国际科研伦理教育与课程发展计划"(R25-TW00951)
关键词 卫生技术评估 伦理评估 伦理框架 医疗决策 health technology assessment ethical assessment ethics framework medical decision-making
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1BANTA D. What is technology assessment? [ J]. International Jour- nal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2009 ( Suppl 1 ) : 7.
  • 2BRAUNACK - MAYER A J. Ethics and Health Technology Assess- ment: Handmaiden and/or Critic? [ J]. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2006, 22 (3) :307 - 312.
  • 3HOFMANN B M. Why ethics should be part of health technology as- sessment [ J ]. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2008, 24(4):423-429.
  • 4TEN HAVE H. Ethical perspective on health technology assessment [ J]. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2004, 20(1) :71 -76.
  • 5HOFMANN B. Toward a procedure for integrating moral issues in health technology assessment [ J]. International Journal of Technolo- gy Assessment in Health Care, 2005, 21 ( 3 ) :312 - 318.
  • 6BUELS A, CARON L, DE LANGAVANT G C. Tackling ethical is- sues in health technology assessment: A proposed framework [ J]. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2011, 27(3) :230 -237.
  • 7韩启德.对疾病危险因素控制和癌症筛检的考量[J].医学与哲学(A),2014,35(8):1-6. 被引量:19
  • 8DEGRAZIA D. Common Morality, Coherence and the Principles of Biomedical Ethics [ J]. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 2003, 13(2) :219 -230.
  • 9肖健,严金海,吕群蓉.彼彻姆和查瑞斯的原则主义进路及其改进[J].医学与哲学(A),2008,29(11):40-42. 被引量:2
  • 10周桂田,徐健铭.建构开放与民主的社会对话之决策程序:参与式科技评估[J].人文与社会科学简讯,2013,14(4):43-50.

二级参考文献35

  • 1DeGrazia D. Common Morality, Coherence and the Principles of Bi omedical Ethics [J]. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 2003, (13) :227.
  • 2Green R M, Gert B, Clouser K D. The method of public morality versus the method of principlism[J].Journal of Medicine and Phi losophy, 199:3, (18) : 477.
  • 3Beauchamp T L, DeGrazia, D. Principle and Princilism[M]// George K. Handbook of Bioethics. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004 : 57.
  • 4Beauchamp T L. Principlism and its Alleged Competitors[J].Ken nedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1995(5) :181.
  • 5Beauchamp T I. , Childress J F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics [M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 2001(3):398.
  • 6Richardson H S. Specifying Norms as a Way to Resolve Concrete Ethical Problems[J].Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1990(19) : 279-310.
  • 7Gert B,Culver C M,Clouser D. Bioethics: A Return toFundamentals[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997:71.
  • 8亨利·西季威克.伦理学方法[M].廖申白,译.北京:中国社会科学,1997:36-38.
  • 9恩格尔·哈特.生命伦理学的基础[M].范瑞平,译.长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1996:2.
  • 10Habermas J. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action[M]. Massachusetts : MIT Press, 1990 : 89.

同被引文献32

引证文献5

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部