摘要
目的 剖析临床路径教学用于小儿呼吸内科临床带教中的效果。方法 将我科2015年1~12月纳入的48名实习医生随机等分成甲、乙两组。甲组于临床带教中应用临床路径教学法,乙组应用常规教学法。观察并比较两组的带教效果。结果 甲组的病例书写成绩为（89.24±7.13）分、病例分析成绩为（93.75±6.04）分,乙组分别为（80.51±7.96）分、（81.63±9.28）分。甲组得分高于乙组。两组对比,差异具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。针对临床技能考核成绩,甲组高于乙组[（93.82±6.17）分vs.（82.35±8.27）分],P〈0.05。结论 小儿呼吸内科临床带教应用临床路径教学法,能取得较好的带教效果。
Objective To analyze the clinical pathway teaching used in pediatric respiratory medicine clinical teaching effect. Methods From January to December 2015, 48 interns were randomly divided into two groups randomly. A group in the clinical teaching method of clinical pathway teaching, group B using conventional teaching method. Observation and comparison of the two groups of teaching effect. Results Division of medical records writing scores for（89.24±7.13）, score of case analysis（93.75±6.04）, group B respectively（80.51±7.96）,（81.63±9.28）. The score is higher than that of group B. The difference was statistically significant between the two groups（P0.05）. According to the clinical skills assessment scores of group A were higher than those in group B [（93.82±6.17） vs.（82.35±8.27）], P0.05. Conclusion Clinical pathway teaching method of clinical teaching of respiratory medicine in children can get better teaching effect.
出处
《中国继续医学教育》
2016年第22期9-10,共2页
China Continuing Medical Education
关键词
临床路径
小儿呼吸内科
应用效果
临床带教
Clinical pathway
Pediatric respiratory medicine
Application effect
Clinical teaching
