期刊文献+

基于InCites数据库的毒理学研究领域的发展态势 被引量:5

Advances in In Cites-covered toxicology research
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对1980-2015年国内外毒理学科研产出、学术影响力及合作情况进行比较分析。方法:利用In Cites数据库,从发文量指标、论文被引指标、科研合作指标对毒理学研究的国家、中国科研机构和作者进行文献计量分析,并结合Web of Science数据库对高被引论文进行内容分析。结果:研究时间范围内,美国、英国和日本是毒理学研究发文相对较高的国家,我国毒理学研究发文量呈指数型增长的同时质量也显著提升,正在向世界平均水平靠近。结论:今后我国毒理学发展需在加大科研投入的同时,加强学科发展定位和体系建设,重视前沿动态与回顾分析相结合并注重国际及横向合作,加快毒理学发展步伐,提高科研成果的数量和质量。 Objective To comparatively analyze the domestic and foreign sicentific product, academic impact and cooperation in toxicology from 1980 to 2015.Methods The countries, Chinese scientific research institutions and authors engaged in research of toxicology were analyzed according to the InCites-covered number of published pa-pers, cited papers and collaborations .The highly cited papers covered in Web of Sciene were analyzed by biblio-metric analysis.Results The number of papers on toxicology published by USA, Britian and Japan was greater than that published by other countries.The number of papers on toxicology published by China increased significantly and their academic level was notebly improved.Conclusion China should strengthen the subject system construc-tion, attach importance to frontier and retrospective analysis and international cooperation, speed up the develop-ment of toxicology and improve the academic level of its scientific achievements .
出处 《中华医学图书情报杂志》 CAS 2016年第8期73-80,共8页 Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information Science
基金 重大新药创制专项基金"医科院国际标准药物安全评价技术平台建设"(2013ZX09302302)
关键词 InCites 毒理学 文献计量学 InCites Toxicology Bibliometrics
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

二级参考文献22

  • 1曹中.SCI作为国内科研评价参考探析[J].情报科学,2006,24(6):871-875. 被引量:15
  • 2龚旭.为世界科学把脉 为中国科学建言——出席“21世纪科学前沿与中国的机遇”高层论坛的三位诺贝尔科学奖得主谈世界科学与中国科学[J].中国科学基金,2006,20(4):200-205. 被引量:7
  • 3汤森路透科技集团.WebofScience用户培训手册[M].http://www.thomsonscientific.com.cn.
  • 4桑莱丝.SCI论文在科研水平评价中的地位和作用[J].统计与决策,2007,23(15):59-60. 被引量:30
  • 5Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaeo Andrea D' Angel. Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 2011, 87 : 499 -514.
  • 6John Mingers, Evangelia A. E. C. G. Lipitakis. Counting the citations: a comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and management. Scientometrics, 2010, 85:613 -625.
  • 7Mohammad A. Abolghassemi Fakhree, Abolghasem Jouyban. Scientometric analysis of the major Iranian medical universities. Scientometrics, 2011,87 ( 1 ) : 205 - 220.
  • 8Jiancheng Guan, Xia Gao. Comparison and evaluation of Chinese research performance in the field of bioinformatics. Scientometrics, 2008, 75(2) : 357 -379.
  • 9Price DDS. The analysis of scientometric metrics for policy implication. Scientometrics, 1981, 3 : 47 -54.
  • 10Neuhaus C, Marx W, Daniel HD. The publication and citation impact profiles of Angewandte Chemie and the Journal of the American Chemical Society based on the sections of Chemical Abstracts: A case study on the limitations of the journal impact factor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60 : 176 - 183.

共引文献83

同被引文献39

引证文献5

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部