摘要
目的探讨不稳定心绞痛介入治疗护理使用临床护理路径的效果。方法选取我院的88例不稳定心绞痛患者进行分组研究,分别使用常规护理和临床护理路径护理,对比患者的住院时间以及便秘情况和满意度。结果经过护理,实验组患者的平均住院时间比对照组短,患者便秘情况比对照组少,实验组的满意度比对照组高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论临床中使用临床护理路径对不稳定性心绞痛介入治疗具有非常好的促进效果,患者的住院时间短,症状改善明显,满意度高。
Objective To explore the effect of clinical nursing pathway in the treatment of patients with unstable angina pectoris.Methods 88 cases of unstable angina patients in our hospital were selected and analyzed. Routine nursing care and clinical nursing pathway were used to compare the duration of hospitalization,the situation of constipation and the degree of satisfaction.Results After nursing,the average hospitalization time of the experimental group was shorter than that of the control group,the patients with constipation were less than the control group,the experimental group was higher than the control group,and the results were statisticaly significant（P〈0.05）.Conclusion The clinical nursing pathway in the treatment of unstable angina patients with interventional therapy has a very good effect,the patient＆#39;s hospitalization time is short,the symptoms improved significantly,has the high degree of satisfaction.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2016年第17期242-243,共2页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
临床路径
不稳定性心绞痛
介入治疗
Clinical pathway
Unstable angina pectoris
Interventional therapy
