摘要
美国智库对南海问题的研究在一定程度上影响着美国政府介入南海问题的方式和程度。根据2015年宾夕法尼亚大学智库与公民社会项目对全球智库的排名,布鲁金斯学会、卡耐基国际和平研究院、外交协会、战略与国际问题研究中心和新美国安全中心被评为全美外交政策和国际事务领域最重要的智库,位列世界排名的前列。由于具有长期的理论研究积累、广泛的学术和社会影响力,这些智库关于南海问题的研究成果不仅反映了美国精英阶层对美国亚太利益的界定和认知发展轨迹,也预示着美国政府关于南海问题的政策走向。本文意在对这5个智库关于南海问题的主要思想进行梳理,从而揭示美国智库在南海问题政策研究中的战略目标,以期为我国维护南海主权提供参考。
The studies of US think tanks on the issue of the South China Sea affect the manner and extent of the intervention of the US government in the issue of the South China Sea to some extent.According to the 2015 global think tank rankings published by the Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program at the University of Pennsylvania,the Brookings Institution,the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,the Council on Foreign Relations,the Center for Strategic and International Studies and the Center for New American Security are among top US think tanks of foreign policy and international affairs,and they are ranked atop in the world.Due to a long-term accumulation of theoretical research,and a wide range of academic and social influence,the research results of these think tanks on the South China Sea issue not only reflect the trajectory of the development of the definition and cognition of the Asia-Pacific interests of the United States of the American elite,but also indicate the policy direction of the South China Sea issue of the United States government.This article is intended to sort out the major thoughts of the South China Sea issue of these five think tanks,and to reveal the strategic objectives of American think tanks in policy research on the South China Sea issue,in order to provide reference for China to maintain the sovereignty of the South China Sea.
出处
《国际关系研究》
2016年第4期87-101,154-155,共15页
Journal of International Relations
关键词
美国智库
南海问题
US think tank
issue of the South China Sea
