摘要
目的探讨PGLA线体埋线和传统针刺疗法治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的近期及远期疗效差异。方法将60例糖尿病周围神经病变患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组(30例)采取PGLA线体埋线,对照组(30例)采取传统针刺疗法。按照《密西根糖尿病周围神经病评分(MDNS)》、神经感觉传导速度(SCV)、运动传导速度(MCV)评定方案分别对2组治疗前后进行评估。结果 2组糖尿病周围神经病变临床评分、神经电生理的治疗后症状对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 PGLA线体埋线在改善临床症状和远期疗法方面优于传统针刺疗法。
Objective To study the PGLA line catgut embedding therapy and traditional acupuncture therapy in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the recent and forward curative effects of difference. Methods 60cases of patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy were randomly divided into into treatment group and control group, treatment group （30 cases） adopt PGLA line catgut embedding therapy, control group（30 cases） adopt the traditional acupuncture therapy. The 2 groups were assessed by the ＂Michigan Diabetes Peripheral Neuropathy Score （MDNS）＂ and the nerve sensory conduction velocity （SCV） and motor conduction velocity （MCV）. Results there were significant differences in the clinical scores of diabetic peripheral neuropathy （P〈0.05） between the two groups. Conclusion PGLA line embedding in the improvement of clinical symptoms and forward curative effects is superior to the traditional acupuncture therapy.
出处
《云南中医学院学报》
2016年第5期40-42,46,共4页
Journal of Yunnan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金
广东省中医药局科研项目(20141047)
关键词
PGLA线体埋线
传统针刺法
糖尿病周围神经病变
PGLA line body embedded wire
traditional acupuncture method
diabetic peripheral neuropathy
