摘要
等同于最小损害原则的必要性原则,在内涵上经历了从"必要的目的与必要的手段"到"必要的手段"的转变。为了预防与控制公权力行使的恣意与专横,应当客观化必要性原则。在判断何为必要性手段时,不应当忽略不同手段的有效性差别。如果通过成本收益分析方法,再借助于手段的相对损害计算公式,对异同有效性的手段进行损害大小比较,就能有效破解最小损害性难以客观判定的难题。
The principle of necessity, which is equivalent to the principle of minimum damage, has changed from ＂the necessary purpose and necessary means＂ to ＂ the necessary means＂ in its meaning. In order to prevent and control the arbitrary exercise of public authority, the principle of necessity should be more objective. In judging what amount to the necessary means, we should not ignore the effective differences of different means. If we combine the cost-benefit analysis with the formula of relative damage to compare the damage caused by different means, then the minimum damage can be objectively determined.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第5期178-195,共18页
China Legal Science
