摘要
目的:对比微创钢板固定与交锁髓内钉固定治疗闭合性胫骨干骨折的效果。方法:将60例闭合性胫骨干骨折患者随机分为两组,30例/组。对照组行交锁髓内钉固定,观察组行微创钢板固定,对比两组术后恢复情况。结果:两组临床疗效无显著差异(P>0.05);对照组并发症发生率明显高于观察组,差异显著(P<0.05)。结论 :两种手术治疗闭合性胫骨干骨折的疗效相近,但行微创钢板固定的患者术后并发症发生率更低。
Objective： To compare the effect of closed fracture of tibiofibular shaft treated by minimal y invasive plate osteosynthesis and interlocking intermeddler nail. Methods： To randomly divided 60 cases of patients with closed fracture of tibiofibular shaft into two groups, 30 cases/ group. The control group was implemented the interlocking intermeddler nail, the treatment group was implemented the minimal y invasive plate osteosynthesis, to compared the recovery condition after operation of them. Results： The clinical effect of them was no statistical significance （P〉0.05）. The incidence rate of complication of the control group was significantly greater than the treatment group, there was statistical significance （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： The treatment effects were closed of two methods for the closed fracture of tibiofibular shaft, but the minimal y invasive plate osteosynthesis has lower incidence rate of complication.
出处
《中国医疗器械信息》
2016年第04X期3-4,共2页
China Medical Device Information
关键词
微创钢板固定
交锁髓内钉固定
闭合性胫骨干骨折
minimal yinvasive plate osteosynthesis
interlocking intermeddler nail
closed fracture of tibiofibular shaft
