摘要
目的对比高通量血液透析与常规血液透析的不同疗效。方法选取2012年1月~2014年1月在我院接受维持性血液透析患者80例,分为治疗组与对照组各40例,对照组给予传统低通量持续性血液透析,治疗组给予高通量持续性血液透析。结果治疗6个月后,治疗组的血磷（P）、甲状旁腺激素（i PTH）、β2–微球蛋白（β2–MG）下降较对照组明显,差异具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;两组血清肌酐（Scr）、尿素氮（BUN）也有下降,但与对照组比较无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论高通量血液透析能更有效清除中、大分子物质,且不良反应发生率不增加,比常规血液透析更具有优势。
Objective To compare the curative effect of high flux hemodialysis with regular hemodialysis. Methods From January 2012 to January 2014,80 cases receiving maintenance hemodialysis patients in our hospital were selected and divided into the treatment group and control group,40 cases in each group,the control group was given conventional low flux continuous hemodialysis,the treatment group was given high flux hemodialysis continuously. Results After 6 months treatment,blood phosphorus,parathyroid hormone and beta 2–microglobulin in treatment group decline obviously than the control（P 〈0.05）,serum creatinine and urea nitrogen of the two groups have significantly lower,but the difference has no statistical significance（P 〉0.05）. Conclusion The high flux hemodialysis can be more effectively remove macromolecular substances,and does not increase the incidence of adverse reactions,which has more advantages than conventional hemodialysis.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2016年第19期55-57,共3页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
高通量血液透析
常规血液透析
血磷
High flux hemodialysis
Conventional hemodialysis
Blood phosphorus
