摘要
目的对比评价常规的康复治疗与运动康复治疗在脑卒中康复治疗过程中的应用效果比较。方法选择我院2014年1月~2015年6月康复院区收治的脑卒中患者146例,按随机的方式平均分为实验组与空白组,空白组给予常规的康复治疗,实验给予运动康复疗法,康复治疗两个月后对比两组患者的生活能力评分、运动功能评分、治疗总有效率及患者满意度。结果对比两组患者治疗前后的生活能力评分与运动功能评分可见组内比较均有统计学意义,P〈0.05;且实验组与空白组之间的组间对比差异也有统计学意义,P〈0.05;比较两组患者的治疗总有效率可见实验组91.25%,空白组63.25%,差异有统计学意义,P〈0.05;对比两组患者的患者满意度可见实验组96.25%,空白组59.25%差异有统计学意义P〈0.05。结论常规康复治疗与运动康复治疗在脑卒中康复治疗中均可以收到良好效果,且运动康复治疗比常规治疗效果更加显著。
Objective To compare the effect of routine rehabilitation and exercise rehabilitation in stroke rehabilitation. Methods 164 stroke patients admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to June 2015 were randomly divided into experimental group and blank group. The control group was treated with routine rehabilitation therapy,and exercise rehabilitation therapy,two months after rehabilitation compared the two groups of patients living ability score,motor function score,the total effective rate of treatment and patient satisfaction. Results There were significant differences between the two groups before and after treatment（P〈 0.05）. There was also significant difference between the experimental group and the blank group（P 〈0.05）. There was significant difference between the two groups in the scores of the living ability score and the motor function score. The total effective rate of the two groups was 91.25% in the experimental group and 63.25% in the blank group,the difference was statistically significant（P〈 0.05）. The satisfaction of the two groups was 96.25% in the experimental group and 59.25% there was statistical significance P 〈0.05. Conclusion Conventional rehabilitation therapy and exercise rehabilitation therapy in stroke rehabilitation can receive good results,and sports rehabilitation therapy is more significant than the conventional treatment.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2016年第19期61-62,共2页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
常规康复治疗
运动康复疗法
脑卒中
Conventional rehabilitation treatment
Sports rehabilitation treatment
Stroke
