期刊文献+

血清HE4、NSE、CYFRA21-1水平变化对肺癌的诊断价值 被引量:15

Diagnostic value of serum HE4,NSE and CYFRA21-1 levels for lung cancer patients
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨血清HE4、NSE、CYFRA21-1水平变化对肺癌的诊断价值。方法采用电化学发光法检测88例肺癌患者和70例肺良性疾病患者及50例健康对照者血清中的HE4、NSE、CYFRA21-1水平。结果肺癌组血清HE4、NSE、CYFRA21-1水平明显高于肺良性疾病组和健康对照组(P<0.05);腺癌、鳞癌、小细胞肺癌分别以HE4、CYFRA21-1、N SE检测敏感性最高(P<0.05);HE4、NSE、CYFRA21-1联合检测较单项检测诊断敏感性显著提高(P<0.05)。结论 HE4、NSE、CYFRA21-1水平变化有助于肺癌的诊断和鉴别诊断,三项肿瘤标志物联合检测优于各项目单独检测。 Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of serum HFA, NSE and CYFRA21-1 levels for lung cancer. Methods The serum HFA, NSE and CYFRA21-1 levels in 88 patients with lung cancer and 70 pa- tients with benign lung disease patients and 50 healthy control was detected by using chemoluminescenee method. Re- suits The serum HFA, NSE and CYFRA21-1 levels in lung cancer were significantly higher than that in benign lung disease and the healthy control group ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The highest sensitivity of serum tumor markers in adencarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and small cell lung cancer was HFA, CYFRA21-1 and NSE respectively. Compared with each single item, the diagnostic sensitivity of the combined detection of HFA, NSE and CYFRA21-1 was greatly im- proved (P 〈 0. 05). Conclusion The serum HE4, NSE and CYFRA21-1 levels contribute to the diagnosis and dif- ferential diagnosis of lung cancer, and the three combined detection of tumor markers is superior to each project indi- vidually tested.
出处 《临床肺科杂志》 2016年第12期2159-2161,共3页 Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine
关键词 肺癌 HE4 NSE CYFRA21-1 lung cancer HFA NSE CYFRA21-1
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献50

  • 1陈香丽,陈小燕.血清肿瘤标记物在肺癌诊断中的意义[J].临床肺科杂志,2004,9(6):590-592. 被引量:26
  • 2Siegel R,Naishadham D,Jemal A. Cancer Statistics,2012[ J]. CA Cancer J Clin ,2012,62 : 10 - 29.
  • 3Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J ,et al. Global cancer statistics[ J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2005,55:74 - 108.
  • 4Molina R, Filella X, Auge JM, et al. Tumor markers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer as an aid in histological diagnosis and prognosis. Comparison with the main clinical and pathological prognostic factors [ J ]. Tumour Biology,2003, 24 (4) :209 - 218.
  • 5Kawachi R, Nakazato Y, Takei H, et al. Clinical significance of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level for clinical stage I non small cell lung cancer:can preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level predict pathological stage? [ J]. Interactive Cardiovasc Tho- racic Surgery,2009,9 : 199 - 202.
  • 6Franjevi A, Pavicevic R, Bubanovic G. Differences in initial NSE levels in malignant and benign diseases of the thoracic wall [ J ]. Clin Lab, 2012, 58 (3 - 4) :245 - 252.
  • 7Arrieta O, Saavedra-Perez D, Kuri R, et al. Brain metastasis de- velopment and poor survival associated with carcinoembryonic anti- gen (CEA) level in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a pro- spective analysis [ J]. BMC Cancer, 2009, 9: 119.
  • 8Park SY,Lee JG,Kim J,et al.Preoperative serum CYFRA 21-1level as a prognostic factor in surgically treated adenocarcinoma of lung[J].Lung Cancer,2013,79(2):156-160.
  • 9Hanada S,Nishiyama N,Mizuguchi S,et al.Clinicopathological significance of combined analysis of cytokeratin19expression and preoperative serum CYFRA21-1levels in human lung squamous cell carcinoma[J].Osaka City Med J,2013,59(1):35-44.
  • 10Facchinetti F,Tiseo M,Gnetti L,et al.NSE level in combined neuroendocrine and adenocarcinoma EGFR mutated lung cancer resistant to EGFR-TKI[J].Lung Cancer,2013,82(1):177-178.

共引文献99

同被引文献119

引证文献15

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部