摘要
清华简编者把一篇简文题为《尹诰》,称它是"《尚书》中的一篇",是真"古文《尚书》"。这个说法,存在很多问题。历来《尚书》各本均无《尹诰》之篇名,清华简题名《尹诰》是误读《礼记》和郑注所致,《尹诰》简文根本不合《尚书》之"诰"体,且简文与历史事实充满着矛盾。有鉴于此,简文应该是战国时人编造的有关伊尹与汤事迹的习作。
The editors of Qinghua Bamboo slips made title ＂Yingao＇to an article and atated it was one piece of ＂Shang Shu＂. This statement had many problems. All ＂Shang Shu＂editions had no title named ＂Yingao＂which title stemed from the editor＇s misreading. Besides, the article isn＇t the form of ＂Gao＇in ＂Shang Shu＂. In fact, this article was an exercise composition fabri- cated by scholar during the Warring States period.
作者
杨善群
YANG Shan-qun(Institute of History, Shanghai Academy social sciences, Shanghai 200235 ,Chin)
出处
《齐鲁学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第5期5-9,共5页
Qilu Journal
关键词
清华简
《尹诰》
误读
矛盾
编造
Qinghua Bamboo slips
＂Yingao＂
misread
contradiction
fabricate
