期刊文献+

审计师流动与财务报告可比性--基于中国会计师事务所合并的经验证据 被引量:16

Auditor Flow and Financial Statement Comparability:Evidence from Audit Firm Mergers in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文主要从审计师流动的视角考察审计师对客户财务报告可比性的动态影响。基于1998-2012年中国发生的47起会计师事务所合并事件,我们发现,合并前,相对于相同审计师群审计的两家客户的应计利润可比性,不同审计师群审计的两家客户的应计利润可比性更差;而合并后,不同审计师群审计的两家客户的财务报告可比性显著提高。同时,我们还发现,在合并后,相对于两家新客户的应计利润可比性,不同审计师群审计的两家老客户的应计利润可比性更差。这些研究结果表明,审计师流动导致的审计风格转变是影响财务报告可比性的重要因素,而且其影响程度在老客户与新客户上存在显著的差异。 This study examines the dynamic role of auditor in the production of financial statement comparability from the perspective of auditor flow.Based on47 mergers of audit firms in China from 1998 to 2012,we find that,before mergers,the accrual comparability of two clients audited by different groups is lower than that of two clients audited by the same group.However,after the mergers,the accrual comparability of two clients audited by different groups is significantly increased.Meanwhile,we find that,after the merger,the accrual comparability of two existing clients audited by different auditor groups is lower than that of two newly acquired clients.Our results suggest that the change of audit style caused by auditor flow is an important factor affecting the comparability of financial reporting.And its impact has significant differences on the old clients and new clients.
出处 《会计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第10期86-92,共7页 Accounting Research
基金 国家自然科学基金(71102126、71672207)的研究成果。国家自然科学基金(71302123) 财政部全国会计科研课题重点项目(2015KJA020) 中央财经大学青年科研创新团队支持计划“实证会计与审计”资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献41

  • 1会计信息质量特征研究课题组.对建立我国会计信息质量特征体系的认识[J].会计研究,2006(1):16-24. 被引量:110
  • 2王建新.公司治理结构、盈余管理动机与长期资产减值转回——来自我国上市公司的经验证据[J].会计研究,2007(5):60-66. 被引量:105
  • 3Basu, S. 1997. The Conservatism Principle and the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24 (1): 3N37.
  • 4Cohen, A., A. Dey, and T. Z. Lys. 2008. Real and Accrual- based Earnings Management in the Pre -and Post - Sarbanes - Oxley Periods. The Accounting Review, 83 ( 3 ) : 757 - 787.
  • 5De Franco, G., S. Kothari, and R. Verdi. 2011. The Benefits of Financial Statement Comparability. Journal of Ac- counting Research, 49 (4) : 895 -931.
  • 6Dechow, M. P., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. SweeneY. 1995. Detecting Earnings Management. Accounting Review,70 (2),. 193 -225.
  • 7Demski, J. S. , and D. E. M. Sappington. 1987. Delegated Expertise. Journal of Accounting Research, 25 (1): 68-89.
  • 8Ewert, R. , and A. Wagenhofer. 2005. Economic Effects of Tightening Accounting Standards to Restrict Earnings Management. The Accounting Review, 80 (4) : 1101 - 1124.
  • 9Gong, G., L. Y. Li, and L. Zhou. 2013. Earnings Non - Synchronicity and Voluntary Disclosure. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30 (4) : 1560 - 1589.
  • 10Graham, J. R., C. R. Harvey, and S. Rajgopal. 2005. The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Repor- ting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40 ( 1 ) : 3 N 73.

共引文献212

同被引文献190

引证文献16

二级引证文献156

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部