期刊文献+

争论焦点和集团重组——政府间谈判阶段的安理会改革 被引量:4

Bone of Contention and Blocs Regrouping:UN Security Council Reforms During the IGN Period
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 联合国大会第62/557号决定标志着安理会改革由"不限成员名额工作组"模式转变为政府间谈判模式。在政府间谈判阶段,各种改革力量围绕谈判框架和谈判原则展开了激烈交锋。成员国主导原则得到了中国以及"团结谋共识"集团的积极支持。同时,改革中的一些主要集团也发生着分化和重组。在原有的四国集团、"团结谋共识"、非洲联盟等国家集团之外,L69集团、小岛国家联盟等新的集团也日益活跃起来。印度等国家领导的L69集团试图扮演协调各方立场的角色。非洲联盟内部的立场分歧有加剧的趋势,成为影响改革进展的一大变数。美国在这一阶段调整了对印度"入常"的态度,拉拢印度制衡中国的意图更加明显。为此,中国在政府间谈判中宜采取"低介入"的策略,防止安理会改革成为离间中印和中非关系的工具。 The UN General Assembly decision 62/557 signals a shift from the 'Open-ended Working Group' model to the Intergovernmental Negotiation(IGN) model in Security Council reforms.During the intergovernmental negotiation,heated contention revolved around the framework and principle of the negotiation.The member state-led principle has gained support from China and the 'Uniting for Consensus.' Meanwhile,some of the major reforming blocs have gone through regrouping.Besides the Group of Four,the 'Uniting for Consensus,' and the African Union,L69 and Small Island Developing States are also getting increasingly involved in the negotiation.Moreover,the India-led L69 and others try to coordinate the positions of different parties.However,on the one hand,the increasing divergence among the AU members shows the unified stance is in a precarious situation.This has become the major uncertainty that will influence the reform.On the other hand,by supporting India's pursuit of the permanent membership of the Security Council,the United States seeks to woo India so as to balance China.Based on the analysis,this article suggests that it would be wise for China to take a 'low involvement' tacit to prevent the Security Council reform to be used by certain countries to damage the Sino-Indian and Sino-African relationships.
作者 毛瑞鹏
出处 《国际展望》 CSSCI 2017年第1期70-89,共20页 Global Review
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究项目"联合国安理会改革与美国的选择性支持政策研究"(12YJCGJW009)的阶段性成果
关键词 联合国 安理会改革 政府间谈判 成员国主导原则 集团重组 UN Security Council reform Intergovernmental Negotiation(IGN) Principle of Leadership by Member States Regrouping
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献50

  • 1梅丽莎.康利.泰勒,阿卡提.班次瓦特,钟爱.澳大利亚与印度在“印太”认识上的分歧[J].印度洋经济体研究,2014(1):138-143. 被引量:13
  • 22001年7月16日签署的《中俄元首莫斯科联合声明》,载《人民日报》,2001年7月17日.
  • 3Lewis A. Tambs (edited and updated) ," English Translation and Analysis of Major Karl Ernst Haushofer's Geopoli- tics of the Pacific Ocean . Studies on the Relationship between Geography and History," ( Mellen studies in geogra- phy, v. 7) ,translated by Ernst J. Brehm, (New York. Edwin Mellen Press, 2002) , p. 141.
  • 4Rory Medcalf, Mapping the Indo-Pacific. China, India, and the United States," in Mohan Malik ,Maritime Security in the Indo-Pacifw. Perspectives from China, India, and the United States (London. Rowman & Littlefield, 2014 ) , p. 50.
  • 5Gurpreet S. Khurana, "Security of Sea Lines. Prospects for India-Japan Cooperation," Strategic Analysis, Volume 31, No. 1, 2007, pp. 139 - 153.
  • 6Manmohan Singh, " PM's Address to Japan-India Association, Japan-India Parliamentary Friendship League and International Friendship Exchange Council," May 28, 2013, available at . http .//pmindia. nic. in/speech-details. php? nodeid= 1319.
  • 7"Japan Is Back," Speech by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) , Washington, D.C., February 22, 2013, available at. http.//www, mofa. go. jp/announce/pm/abe/us_ 20130222en. html.
  • 8Department of Defence, Australian Government, "Defending Australia and Its National Interests, "Defence White Paper 2013, May 13, 2013, p. 3.
  • 9M. Natalegawa,"An Indonesian Perspective on the Indo-Pacific," Speech at CSIS Indonesia Conference, Washing- ton, D.C. , May 16, 2013, available at.http//www, thejakartapost, com/news/2013/05/20/an-indonesian-per- spective -indo-pacific. html.
  • 10Mohan Malik, Maritime Security in the lndo-Pacific. Perspectives from China, India, and the United States ( Lon- don. Rowman & Littlefield, 2014), pp. 21 - 22.

共引文献44

同被引文献62

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部