摘要
目前中国理论界和实务界对于"直接适用的法"的含义与属性存在一定认识上的矛盾与疏漏,对其适用方式也缺乏较为清晰的论述。从相关理论概述、规范属性、调整方式等方面出发,将"直接适用的法"界定为某些国内实体法上的具体的法律规范,"直接适用的法"既不是公法也不是私法,而应当被认定为具有经济法的属性。"直接适用的法"在实践中的适用,其价值和正当性基础很大程度上在于对实质正义的追求,而在个案中,应由法官依职权和自由裁量,通过实质判定的方式加以运用。
At present, in the theoretical and practical fields in China, there are some contradictions and omissions in the understanding of the connotation and attribution of "Law of Immediate Application", and there is a lack of clear exposition of its application as well. Based on the related theories, attribution, the way of adjustment and some other aspects of "Law of Immediate Application",it should be defined as specific legal norms and articles in some domestic substantive law. "Law of Immediate Application" is neither public law nor private law, but it should be recognized as an attribute of economic law. As for its practical application issue, as the value and legitimacy of "Law of Immediate Application" are largely based on the pursuit of substantial justice. In individual cases, it should be applied by the judge in accordance with the terms of reference and discretion, and it should be determined by substantial judgment.
出处
《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2017年第2期136-141,共6页
Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
关键词
“直接适用的法”
经济法
实质正义
实质判定
"Law of Immediate Application"
economic law
substantial justice
substantial judgment