期刊文献+

七氟醚与丙泊酚麻醉对老年冠心病非心脏手术患者心肌保护作用的效果比较 被引量:10

The myocardial protective effect of sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia on the myocardium of elderly patients with coronary heart disease during noncardiac surgery
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察七氟醚与丙泊酚麻醉对老年冠心病非心脏手术患者的心肌保护作用及不良事件。方法选择2015-01~2016-01该院收治的行非心脏手术的老年冠心病患者86例,以随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组43例,术中观察组给予七氟醚维持麻醉,对照组给予丙泊酚维持麻醉。通过检测两组血清白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、心肌肌钙蛋白(c Tn I)及糖原磷酸化酶BB(GP-BB)水平评估其心肌保护作用,比较两组不良事件包括常规不良事件与心脏不良事件发生情况。结果两组术毕即刻较麻醉前IL-6、TNF-α、c Tn I、GP-BB水平均显著升高(P<0.01),观察组IL-6、TNF-α、c Tn I、GP-BB水平依次为(204.68±94.20)pg/ml、(0.69±0.11)ng/ml、(0.82±0.19)ng/ml、(5.18±1.32)ng/ml,升高幅度均明显较对照组小(P<0.05);观察组常规不良事件发生率为6.98%,明显低于对照组的23.26%(P<0.05),心脏不良事件发生率为18.60%,明显低于对照组的44.19%(P<0.05)。结论七氟醚对老年冠心病非心脏手术患者心肌的保护效果优于丙泊酚,且可明显减少常规不良事件与心脏不良事件的发生。 Objective To observe the myocardial protective effect of sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia on the myocardium of elderly patients with coronary heart disease during noncardiac surgery and the adverse events.Methods Eighty-six elderly patients with coronary heart disease receiving noncardiac surgery in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2016 were selected,and divided into the observation group(n = 43) and the control group(n =43) by random number table.The observation group was given the maintenance anesthesia of sevoflurane during the operation,and the control group received the maintenance anesthesia of propofol.The serum levels of interleukin-6(IL-6),tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α),cardiac troponin(c Tn I) and glycogen phosphorylase BB(GP-BB) were detected to evaluate the myocardial protective effect and adverse events including conventional adverse events and adverse cardiac events and were compared between the two groups.Results The levels of IL-6,TNF-α,c Tn I and GPBB were significantly increased immediately after the surgery in the two groups than those before the anesthesia(P〈0.01).The levels of IL-6,TNF-α,c Tn I and GP-BB in the observation group were(204.68 ± 94.20) pg/ml,(0.69 ±0.11) ng/ml,(0.82 ± 0.19) ng/ml and(5.18 ± 1.32) ng/ml respectively,and the ascending ranges of the observation group were significantly less than those of the control group(P〈0.05); The incidence of the conventional adverse events in the observation group(6.98%) was significantly lower than that in the control group(23.26%)(P〈0.05).The incidence of adverse cardiac events of the observation group(18.60%) was significantly lower than that of the control group(44.19%)(P〈0.05).Conclusion Sevoflurane has better myocardial protective effect than propofol on the myocardium of the elderly patients with coronary heart disease during noncardiac surgery.
作者 刘晓刚
出处 《中国临床新医学》 2017年第4期344-347,共4页 CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEW CLINICAL MEDICINE
关键词 七氟醚 冠心病 非心脏手术 心肌保护 不良事件 Sevoflurane Coronary heart disease Noncardiac surgery Myocardial protection Adverse events
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献85

  • 1康彩练,高晨燕.复方抗高血压药物注册临床研究应注意的问题[J].中国临床药理学与治疗学,2006,11(8):952-954. 被引量:9
  • 2Williams FM, Bergin JD. Cardiac screening before noncardiac surgery. Surg Clin North Am, 2009, 89:747- 762.
  • 3Lacnak B, Stejskal D, Jedelsky L, et al. Utilization of glycogen phosphorylass BB measurement in the diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes in the event chest pain. Vnitr Lek, 2007, 53,1164-1169.
  • 4Bein B, Renner J, Caliebe D, et al. Sevoflurane but not propofol preserves myocardial function during minimally inva- sive direct coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesth analg, 2005, 100: 610-616.
  • 5Makino S, Hashimoto K, Gold P. Multiple feedback mechanisms activating orticotrophinreleasing honmone system in the brain during stress. Phanmaeol Biochem Behav, 2002, 73: 147-158.
  • 6Roger C,Bone FC. Toward a theory regarding the pathogenesis of the systemic in-flammatory response syndromes what we do and do not know about cytokine regulation. Crit Care Med, 2004,24:163- 172.
  • 7王裕生.中药药理与应用[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1983.741.
  • 8郑虎昆.中药现代研究与应用[M].北京:学苑出版社,1997:109-110
  • 9吴新民,邓小明,黄文起,梁伟民,缪长虹,米卫东,王保国,王俊科,吴安石,叶铁虎,于布为.七氟醚用于成人全身吸入麻醉的随机、开放、多中心、阳性对照临床研究[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(9):709-711. 被引量:75
  • 10Van den Berg AA,Chitty DA,Jones RD,et al.Intravenous or inhaled in-duction of anesthesia in adults An audit of preoperative patient preferences[J].Anesth Analg,2005;100:1422-4.

共引文献56

同被引文献95

引证文献10

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部