期刊文献+

中美外语教育理念差异比较 被引量:15

Ideological Differences of Foreign Language Education in China and the United States
原文传递
导出
摘要 中国外语教育源自语言译介活动,具有"实用"和"功利"的价值取向,而美国的外语教育源自欧洲传统和同化异族语言文化的需要,更重视其"人文素养"和"同化功能"。"实用主义"外语教育往往导致短期效应,易发生盲目和随意性错误,而"人文主义"外语教育虽然能够获得长期成效,但因通常缺乏实用价值而失去吸引力。因此,为促进外语教育的进一步发展,中美两国均需适当调整理念,相互借鉴,相应增加人文要素和实用价值。 Foreign langnage education in China, which originated from translation, bears on a pragmatic and instrumental ori- entation while in the United States, it is more of social and cultural maneuver, aculturalization on the one hand and cultivation on the other. Pragmatic ideal facilitates quick but short efficiency and even something blind and arbitrary from time to time in the undertaking whereas humanity paradigm results in a long-term fulfillment but too has defects in losing attraction for its little practical value. The guiding principles for foreign language education in both China and the United States, therefore, need ad- justment, with more humanities for the former and more pragmaticality for the latter before their foreign language education can be further improved.
出处 《外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第3期1-6,共6页 Foreign Language Education
基金 王克非主持的国家语委"十三五"科研规划年度重点项目"世界语言生活观测与分析"(项目编号:ZDI135-33) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"国外语言生活状况调研"(项目编号:11JJD740002) 国家社会科学基金一般项目"国家利益视角下的语言规划研究:中美个案对比"(项目编号:11BYY030)的资助
关键词 外语教育 外语教育理念 实用取向 文化功能 foreign language education ideology of foreign language education pragmatic orientation cultural function
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献27

  • 1道布.中国的语言政策和语言规划[J].民族研究,1998(6):42-52. 被引量:34
  • 2普忠良.一些国家的语言立法及政策述略[J].民族语文,2000(2):71-76. 被引量:16
  • 3Ager, D. 1996. Language Policy in Britain and France: The Processes of Policy [M]. Cassell.
  • 4Beardsmore,H. B. 1994. Language policy and planning in western European countries [J]. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (1993/1994) 14: 93-110.
  • 5Cenoz, J. F. & Genesee 1998. (eds.). BeyondBilin gualism:Multilingualism and Multilingual Education [M]. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • 6Cooper, R.L. 1989. Language Planning and Social Change [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 7Gonzalez,A. 1998. Teaching in two or more languages in the Philippine context [A]. In Jasone Cenoz and Fred Genesee 1998. Pp. 192-205.
  • 8Graddol, D. 1997. The Future of English? [M]London:British Council.
  • 9Hoffmann, C. 1996. (ed.). Language, Culture and Communication in Contemporary Europe [M].Clevedon:Multilingual Matters.
  • 10McKay, S. & N. Homberger 1996. (eds.). Sociolinguistics and Language Teaching [M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

共引文献238

同被引文献126

二级引证文献319

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部