期刊文献+

阴式手术与腹腔镜手术治疗宫颈肌瘤临床疗效探究 被引量:5

Effectiveness of vaginal myomectomy vs laparoscopic myomectomy for cervical myoma
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析比较阴式手术与腹腔镜手术治疗宫颈肌瘤的疗效。方法选取石家庄市第一医院妇产科2011年6月-2016年6月诊治的宫颈肌瘤患者89例,分为观察组(采用阴式手术入路)和对照组(采用腹腔镜手术入路),比较两组临床资料和手术相关指标。结果观察组47例,对照组42例。两组平均年龄、肌瘤最大直径、肌瘤类型、手术方式差异均无统计学意义;观察组手术时间[(45.6±19.3)min vs(62.0±27.1)min,P=0.001]、术中出血量[(53.6±18.8)ml vs(64.2±25.9)ml,P=0.029]均少于对照组;两组平均住院日[(5.7±1.3)d vs(5.2±1.1)d]、并发症发生率[8例(17.0%)vs 11例(26.2%)]差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论与腹腔镜手术相比,阴式手术治疗宫颈肌瘤在保证治疗效果的同时手术完成更高效、更安全,该手术对硬件要求低,适合基层医院推广应用。 Objective To compare the effectiveness of vaginal or laparoscopic surgery in the treatment for cervical myoma. Methods A total of 89 cases with cervical myoma in our hospital during June 2011 to June 2016 were selected. All cases were divided into observation group (vaginal myomectomy) and control group (laparoscopic myomectomy). The clinical data and operative indexes were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in mean age, maximum diameter of myoma, type of myoma, clinical symptoms and hysterectomy option. The operating time (45.6±19.3 min vs 62.0±27.1 min, P =0.001) and blood loss (53.6±18.8 ml vs 64.2±25.9 ml, P =0.029) in observation group were less than those in control group with statistically significant differences. There was no significant difference in average hospitalization days (5.7±1.3 days vs 5.2±1.1 days) and complication rates (17.0% vs 26.2%) between the two groups (P > 0.05, respectively). Conclusion Compared with laparoscopic myomectomy, vaginal myomectomy is more effective and safe for patients with cervical myoma.
作者 张宁宁 赵恩锋 赵芳 徐锋 ZHANG Ningning ZHAO Enfeng ZHAO Fang XU Feng(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China)
出处 《解放军医学院学报》 CAS 2017年第7期631-633,638,共4页 Academic Journal of Chinese PLA Medical School
关键词 宫颈肌瘤 阴式手术 肌瘤剔除术 子宫切除术 cervical myoma vaginal operation myomectomy hysterectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献50

  • 1白文佩,李丽平,冯美英,王秀华,秦小琪,李克敏,周应芳.阴式与腹腔镜子宫全切除术的临床效果比较[J].中华妇产科杂志,2005,40(10):656-658. 被引量:50
  • 2韩兴权,万登敏,雷劲松,付强.经腹彩色多普勒超声在宫颈浸润癌诊断中的临床应用[J].中国超声医学杂志,2005,21(10):779-781. 被引量:7
  • 3余秀华,施红,李黎,徐爱芬,张宏.经阴道彩色多普勒超声诊断宫颈病变的价值[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2006,14(1):4-7. 被引量:49
  • 4De Cicco C, Ussia A, Koninckx PR. laparoscopic ureteral repair in gynaeeologieal surgery[ J ]. Curr Opin Obstet Gyneeol,2011, 23 (4) :296-300.
  • 5Meyer NL, Addis IB, Lipscomb GH. Ureteral avulsion during u- terine dilatation and evacuation: a case report [ J ]. J Reprod Med,2006,51 (7) :581-583.
  • 6Stampfl U, Radeleff B,Sommer C,et al. Midtenn results of uter- ine artery embolization using narrow-size calibrated embozene mi- crospheres [ J ]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2011,34 ( 2 ) : 295- 305.
  • 7van derKooij SM,Hehenkamp WJ,Volkers NA,et al. Uterine ar- tery embolization vs hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids : 5-year outcome from the randomized EMMY trial [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2010,203(2) :105. e1-13.
  • 8Freed MM, Spies JB. Uterine artery embolization for fibroids: a review of current outcomes [ J ]. Semin Reprod Med, 2010,28 (3) :235-241.
  • 9Naguib NN, Mbalisike E, Nour-Eldin NE, et al. Leiomyoma vol- ume changes at follow-up after uterine artery embolization : corre- lation with the initial leiomyoma volume and location [ J ]. J Vasc Interv Radio1,2010,21 ( 4 ) :490 -495.
  • 10Katsumori T, Nakajima K, Mihara T. Is a large fibroid a high-risk factor for uterine artery embolization? [ J]. AJR Am J Roentgen- ol, 2003,181 (5) :1309-1314.

共引文献317

同被引文献42

引证文献5

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部